Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Why do levels one and two suck so bad?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="The Levitator" data-source="post: 3671230" data-attributes="member: 40099"><p>I do my best as a DM to make the lower levels interesting, but I'm fortunate to have the majority of my group as long-time players. They prefer to earn what they get, not have levels handed to them. They are used to the slower progression of earlier versions of D&D and other game systems, so they like starting out squishy. In fact, we advance at 50% of the standard EXP progression. Another thing I did to make things a little more interesting (and speed up group play) is to run 1st level as solo adventures. This serves a couple of purposes for us. The first thing is that by starting out 1st level as solos, we effectively start our campaigns at 2nd level. I used 1st level as a kind of fast forward (like the beginning of a movie that gives you a character update and touches on the most pivotal moments in that character's life. The second interesting side effect of doing this is that the group starts a new campaign knowing very little about each other, which makes the start of the campaign more interesting. The only thing they decide at the start is the basic "type" of character they are going to run; warrior type, caster type, divine type or specialist/support/skill monkey type. This helps them get basically a balanced party. Fortunately for me, they are all good enough players that they know how to balance a party out regardless of what everyone chooses.</p><p></p><p>Another thing I do to help low level characters is to give them 1 special item right at the start. They're the heroes right? Why not start them off with a family heirloom or some strange and wondrous item they acquired by some fluke? It's usually in the form of a either a +1 weapon or armor or magic item worth 2,000 gp or less. It gives them the edge they need to get through the lower levels and even allows me a little more freedom in creating creative encounters.</p><p></p><p>While my group considers starting higher than 1st level cheating in a sense, they don't mind getting a little help through the first couple of levels. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /></p><p></p><p>One thing that always confuses me though is when I read of players getting bored if they have to fight the same type of creature twice or more in a campaign (gasp!) A creative DM should be able to set up 5 orc encounters in a row and make them all exciting and unique. Using interesting locations, environments, weather conditions, special circumstances, etc., it's pretty easy to keep a party entertained and on their toes fighting the same creatures more than once. We recently finished a campaign that was based on orcs, orogs and ogres banding together and starting a major war with the humans. To give a world a sense of there being orcs everywhere, they were the primary encounter for the party through the first 4-5 levels of the campaign. They never tired of hacking through a horde of orcs, especially once they became formidable enough to get creative in their orc destroying techniques. Sure, it's more work to make combats interesting by being more creative instead of just turning the pages of the monster manual, but I find it very rewarding when the party gets into an encounter with a new wrinkle that they have to account for. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="The Levitator, post: 3671230, member: 40099"] I do my best as a DM to make the lower levels interesting, but I'm fortunate to have the majority of my group as long-time players. They prefer to earn what they get, not have levels handed to them. They are used to the slower progression of earlier versions of D&D and other game systems, so they like starting out squishy. In fact, we advance at 50% of the standard EXP progression. Another thing I did to make things a little more interesting (and speed up group play) is to run 1st level as solo adventures. This serves a couple of purposes for us. The first thing is that by starting out 1st level as solos, we effectively start our campaigns at 2nd level. I used 1st level as a kind of fast forward (like the beginning of a movie that gives you a character update and touches on the most pivotal moments in that character's life. The second interesting side effect of doing this is that the group starts a new campaign knowing very little about each other, which makes the start of the campaign more interesting. The only thing they decide at the start is the basic "type" of character they are going to run; warrior type, caster type, divine type or specialist/support/skill monkey type. This helps them get basically a balanced party. Fortunately for me, they are all good enough players that they know how to balance a party out regardless of what everyone chooses. Another thing I do to help low level characters is to give them 1 special item right at the start. They're the heroes right? Why not start them off with a family heirloom or some strange and wondrous item they acquired by some fluke? It's usually in the form of a either a +1 weapon or armor or magic item worth 2,000 gp or less. It gives them the edge they need to get through the lower levels and even allows me a little more freedom in creating creative encounters. While my group considers starting higher than 1st level cheating in a sense, they don't mind getting a little help through the first couple of levels. :) One thing that always confuses me though is when I read of players getting bored if they have to fight the same type of creature twice or more in a campaign (gasp!) A creative DM should be able to set up 5 orc encounters in a row and make them all exciting and unique. Using interesting locations, environments, weather conditions, special circumstances, etc., it's pretty easy to keep a party entertained and on their toes fighting the same creatures more than once. We recently finished a campaign that was based on orcs, orogs and ogres banding together and starting a major war with the humans. To give a world a sense of there being orcs everywhere, they were the primary encounter for the party through the first 4-5 levels of the campaign. They never tired of hacking through a horde of orcs, especially once they became formidable enough to get creative in their orc destroying techniques. Sure, it's more work to make combats interesting by being more creative instead of just turning the pages of the monster manual, but I find it very rewarding when the party gets into an encounter with a new wrinkle that they have to account for. :) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Why do levels one and two suck so bad?
Top