Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Sagan Darkside" data-source="post: 690237" data-attributes="member: 9270">Unfortunetly d&amp;d does not lend itself easily to that style of play.You could come up with a general upkeep schedule, and if the pc's don't have it done.. then they suffer some penalties.But- then do you change the schedule when the fight an iron golem- since it would do some damage to weapons versus the goblins they killed last week?&nbsp;It depends on the homebrew I am running at the time- if the world is magic-light, then I will raise the costs. If it is magic heavy, then I will keep it or make ways to circumvent its high cost.But in the end I keep reminding myself that a fighter can swing a sword from dusk to dawn, but the wizard has a limit on their abilities.&nbsp; I don't want to make gaming more technically difficult for someone because they choose to play one class over the other- especially when that class is already technically difficult by design.SD</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Sagan Darkside, post: 690237, member: 9270"] Unfortunetly d&d does not lend itself easily to that style of play. You could come up with a general upkeep schedule, and if the pc's don't have it done.. then they suffer some penalties. But- then do you change the schedule when the fight an iron golem- since it would do some damage to weapons versus the goblins they killed last week? It depends on the homebrew I am running at the time- if the world is magic-light, then I will raise the costs. If it is magic heavy, then I will keep it or make ways to circumvent its high cost. But in the end I keep reminding myself that a fighter can swing a sword from dusk to dawn, but the wizard has a limit on their abilities. I don't want to make gaming more technically difficult for someone because they choose to play one class over the other- especially when that class is already technically difficult by design. SD [/QUOTE]

Verification