Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Next
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
Twitch
YouTube
Facebook (EN Publishing)
Facebook (EN World)
Twitter
Instagram
TikTok
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Why do many people prefer roll-high to roll-under?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Aldarc" data-source="post: 9278048" data-attributes="member: 5142"><p>In practice, however, I'm not sure that is always the case, hence why many people here complain about how their players forget all the different bonuses or which number they are using: e.g., ability attribute, attribute modifier, proficiency, spells, items, etc. There is a lot of math that happens at the table. While that may be an issue mostly with D&D, D&D and its kin are the 800 lb. gorilla in the room, and most (but not all) roll over systems are d20 D&D-based. There is a reason, for example, that Pathfinder 1 was referred to as "Mathfinder." </p><p></p><p></p><p>I disagree with the first sentence. I do not doubt that you have "seen it many times over 20 years or so playing different games." However, you may be exaggerating things about how "very awkward" that this is or how often it trips people up. Because most roll under games are not trying to say, "you want to roll as low as possible" or that "the lower the number, the better." Most roll under systems just amount to trying to roll under a given value, usually either the character's Attribute value or Skill Rating value. So the whole "the lower, the better" doesn't really apply. </p><p></p><p>In my experience, people get tripped up all the time with roll over systems as well. You know how many times I've seen people get tripped up about that over my 20 years or so of playing different games? How long do you have to listen to my stories or read through the threads here? Sure, people understand roll high but there is usually more math involved in roll over than just rolling a high number.</p><p></p><p>If you were to go back in time on this forum, I would be where you are. I would be complaining about roll under or talking about how much better roll over is. You will find many of the threads here on ENWorld where I have done so, and I will still complain about how horrible THAC0 is. But actually running many of these roll under games has been something of a harsh lesson for me about my own assumptions about what is or isn't intuitive. </p><p></p><p><em>Much to my own surprise even</em>, I have found the learning curve for many new players much quicker with roll under systems, at least comparatively with roll over. In some cases, it's been watching long time players who consistently struggled with remembering what they had to roll over or add to their rolls have <em>a much easier time</em> when they play roll under games like Black Hack, Dragonbane, or Mausritter. There is no, "hey did you remember to add this, this, this, and this to your roll?" It's usually just, "did you roll under your ability score?" or "did you roll under your skill score?" </p><p></p><p>You can tell me that roll high is more intuitive, and while that may be true, I can tell you that these roll under games have often been quicker and easier for many of my players who really only had prior experience with roll over games. So the question for me is not "which is more intuitive: roll high or roll low?" Instead, for me the question is, "why are my players having an easier time with roll under than roll over?" I would like to believe that there is an explanation for the phenomenon with an answer that amounts to more than repeating variations of the mantra that "higher is better" or assuming that my intuitions about roll high is what's at stake here. </p><p></p><p></p><p>Just like there are particular issues with some roll under games and not roll under systems universally. <img class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" alt="🤷♂️" title="Man shrugging :man_shrugging:" src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f937-2642.png" data-shortname=":man_shrugging:" /> </p><p></p><p></p><p>I also introduce people to gaming via games other than D&D. They don't have problems with roll under. You often don't even have to add the modifier. You roll and compare with the number on your sheet. You know as soon as you roll. No arithmetic required. It's not hard. </p><p></p><p></p><p>Roll high is more intuitive than roll low. However, what is being contrasted is NOT roll high and roll low, but, rather, <em>roll over</em> and <em>roll under</em>. It is similar to but not the same as the aforementioned. A roll over game is not just about rolling as high as you can. It's about rolling a value <em>over</em> some other value. That is where the complexities often lie. </p><p></p><p>Again, IME, I have personally found roll under to be easier and quicker for people to learn because the player knows when they roll if they succeeded or fail. In terms of the psychology present, there is often instant gratification. Players will generally have the number they need to beat on their character sheet, whether that is a skill or attribute. In roll over systems, the number they have to beat is very often in the GM's head. </p><p></p><p>This is why I have come to increasingly value tabletop games that make it super quick and easy to read success when the roll happens: e.g., many roll under games, PbtA, FitD, Free League's Year Zero Engine, etc. I know that there are roll over games where that's the case too - e.g., Cypher System - but roll over more often then not puts the math after the roll and the TN may or may not be known.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Aldarc, post: 9278048, member: 5142"] In practice, however, I'm not sure that is always the case, hence why many people here complain about how their players forget all the different bonuses or which number they are using: e.g., ability attribute, attribute modifier, proficiency, spells, items, etc. There is a lot of math that happens at the table. While that may be an issue mostly with D&D, D&D and its kin are the 800 lb. gorilla in the room, and most (but not all) roll over systems are d20 D&D-based. There is a reason, for example, that Pathfinder 1 was referred to as "Mathfinder." I disagree with the first sentence. I do not doubt that you have "seen it many times over 20 years or so playing different games." However, you may be exaggerating things about how "very awkward" that this is or how often it trips people up. Because most roll under games are not trying to say, "you want to roll as low as possible" or that "the lower the number, the better." Most roll under systems just amount to trying to roll under a given value, usually either the character's Attribute value or Skill Rating value. So the whole "the lower, the better" doesn't really apply. In my experience, people get tripped up all the time with roll over systems as well. You know how many times I've seen people get tripped up about that over my 20 years or so of playing different games? How long do you have to listen to my stories or read through the threads here? Sure, people understand roll high but there is usually more math involved in roll over than just rolling a high number. If you were to go back in time on this forum, I would be where you are. I would be complaining about roll under or talking about how much better roll over is. You will find many of the threads here on ENWorld where I have done so, and I will still complain about how horrible THAC0 is. But actually running many of these roll under games has been something of a harsh lesson for me about my own assumptions about what is or isn't intuitive. [I]Much to my own surprise even[/I], I have found the learning curve for many new players much quicker with roll under systems, at least comparatively with roll over. In some cases, it's been watching long time players who consistently struggled with remembering what they had to roll over or add to their rolls have [I]a much easier time[/I] when they play roll under games like Black Hack, Dragonbane, or Mausritter. There is no, "hey did you remember to add this, this, this, and this to your roll?" It's usually just, "did you roll under your ability score?" or "did you roll under your skill score?" You can tell me that roll high is more intuitive, and while that may be true, I can tell you that these roll under games have often been quicker and easier for many of my players who really only had prior experience with roll over games. So the question for me is not "which is more intuitive: roll high or roll low?" Instead, for me the question is, "why are my players having an easier time with roll under than roll over?" I would like to believe that there is an explanation for the phenomenon with an answer that amounts to more than repeating variations of the mantra that "higher is better" or assuming that my intuitions about roll high is what's at stake here. Just like there are particular issues with some roll under games and not roll under systems universally. 🤷♂️ I also introduce people to gaming via games other than D&D. They don't have problems with roll under. You often don't even have to add the modifier. You roll and compare with the number on your sheet. You know as soon as you roll. No arithmetic required. It's not hard. Roll high is more intuitive than roll low. However, what is being contrasted is NOT roll high and roll low, but, rather, [I]roll over[/I] and [I]roll under[/I]. It is similar to but not the same as the aforementioned. A roll over game is not just about rolling as high as you can. It's about rolling a value [I]over[/I] some other value. That is where the complexities often lie. Again, IME, I have personally found roll under to be easier and quicker for people to learn because the player knows when they roll if they succeeded or fail. In terms of the psychology present, there is often instant gratification. Players will generally have the number they need to beat on their character sheet, whether that is a skill or attribute. In roll over systems, the number they have to beat is very often in the GM's head. This is why I have come to increasingly value tabletop games that make it super quick and easy to read success when the roll happens: e.g., many roll under games, PbtA, FitD, Free League's Year Zero Engine, etc. I know that there are roll over games where that's the case too - e.g., Cypher System - but roll over more often then not puts the math after the roll and the TN may or may not be known. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Why do many people prefer roll-high to roll-under?
Top