Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Greg K" data-source="post: 8426030" data-attributes="member: 5038">The more I look at 5e classes and those of Fantasy Craft, I think, overall, that I prefer FC's classes- especially, when adding in the Crusader and Martial Artist base classes from Call to Arms and the Emissary base class from Adventure Companion along with the additional expert classes from Call to Arms.I am not claiming that FC classes are handled perfectly. There are a few class mechanics among some 5e classes that I prefer.  I also do not like that FC expert classes cannot be taken until 5th level.* However, the classes and the choices built within (along with several being Feat chains open to a variety of classes)  they better cover a number concepts, in my opinion. The setup is also better for non-magic or low magic campaigns that go beyond levels 1-5 or so , imo.* With base classes, and possibly, correct feats one can model the concept behind an Expet class making the transition feel natural. However, I find waiting until 5th level  for the Expert class is ridiculous (as was the case of PrCs in 3e)</blockquote>