Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Mind of tempest" data-source="post: 8682971" data-attributes="member: 7029233">given I can't play a convincing human if you paid me I am fairly certain that point is not true if only because we can barely play ourselves.why did you not just use alluring before that seems to work much better?alluring is how ever multifaceted some like the look, some like their place in the world and so on.no, as I do not know the answer or I would have picked one or made it by now.not catfolk I do not quite get on with animals, nor do anthropomorphic animals interest me as I find them uninteresting and unambitious.I see them as more by what their power selection is which is far more to my taste and why would you not want to have flexibility?It is not the nerdiness that I object to as I am born to nerdiness, I simply prefer psionics to wizardry as wizardry thematically feels math heavy?wizardly and people who love to play wizards tend to view it like formulas or programing or equations things my parents are good at but I have only the basic ability, psionics lacks that baggage.in essence I see arcane wizards as people who work in STEM and I will never be able to do that, plus I like the psionic subfields more as they are what I find thematically interesting.</blockquote>