Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Why Do People Hate Gnomes?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="EzekielRaiden" data-source="post: 8684268" data-attributes="member: 6790260"><p>Welcome to the catch-22 that dragonborn fans have been forced to endure for 15 years now. Our preferences don't have enough traction or historical representation to <em>deserve</em> inclusion, so they never get a chance to develop a foothold, meaning they can't <em>get</em> any traction or historical representation.</p><p></p><p>The key difference, at least for me, is that gnomes DO have traction within the D&D space. That traction just isn't very interesting for most people, for several reasons. Whose fault that is, I've no idea (well, mostly I think it's the fault of Dragonlance and World of Warcraft, but that's a separate topic.) But the fact of the matter is, <em>even though there are other interpretations of gnomes</em>, the only one that's made any headway in the D&D-and-its-children space is "eccentric expert and usually comic relief/hyper-cutesy twee." That's why they're disliked so much; people who would want to do something serious with them are just usually choosing to <em>play something else.</em></p><p></p><p>And I get it. I <em>get</em> that that sucks if you're a gnome fan, for exactly the reason I gave at the start. I've been there, with people (even theoretically friendly/positive ones) straight-up telling me I should be glad that dragonborn got included in the PHB at all.</p><p></p><p>But the thread was asking <em>why</em> this response occurs. I gave what I consider to be the full and complete answer: they're short (short races will always be less popular than human-height or taller races, <em>except</em> for their potential as twee or comic-relief options), they're often portrayed <em>even by players who love them</em> as completely non-serious, usually comic relief or zAnY wAcKy HiJiNkS types; their major, public-facing appearances in well-known fiction almost exclusively support the latter, with World of Warcraft being the prime offender (since it's much bigger than D&D has ever been, having had <em>easily</em> tens of millions of players over the many years it's been a thing.)</p><p></p><p>That doesn't mean you shouldn't play them. Hell, it doesn't mean you shouldn't campaign for gnomes to get a different take, something more interesting than the crappy typecasting they've gotten. You should totally do both of those things. But those three reasons are why most players won't play them or even outright dislike them, and it's very hard for individual folks (like you and me) to change any of those things.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="EzekielRaiden, post: 8684268, member: 6790260"] Welcome to the catch-22 that dragonborn fans have been forced to endure for 15 years now. Our preferences don't have enough traction or historical representation to [I]deserve[/I] inclusion, so they never get a chance to develop a foothold, meaning they can't [I]get[/I] any traction or historical representation. The key difference, at least for me, is that gnomes DO have traction within the D&D space. That traction just isn't very interesting for most people, for several reasons. Whose fault that is, I've no idea (well, mostly I think it's the fault of Dragonlance and World of Warcraft, but that's a separate topic.) But the fact of the matter is, [I]even though there are other interpretations of gnomes[/I], the only one that's made any headway in the D&D-and-its-children space is "eccentric expert and usually comic relief/hyper-cutesy twee." That's why they're disliked so much; people who would want to do something serious with them are just usually choosing to [I]play something else.[/I] And I get it. I [I]get[/I] that that sucks if you're a gnome fan, for exactly the reason I gave at the start. I've been there, with people (even theoretically friendly/positive ones) straight-up telling me I should be glad that dragonborn got included in the PHB at all. But the thread was asking [I]why[/I] this response occurs. I gave what I consider to be the full and complete answer: they're short (short races will always be less popular than human-height or taller races, [I]except[/I] for their potential as twee or comic-relief options), they're often portrayed [I]even by players who love them[/I] as completely non-serious, usually comic relief or zAnY wAcKy HiJiNkS types; their major, public-facing appearances in well-known fiction almost exclusively support the latter, with World of Warcraft being the prime offender (since it's much bigger than D&D has ever been, having had [I]easily[/I] tens of millions of players over the many years it's been a thing.) That doesn't mean you shouldn't play them. Hell, it doesn't mean you shouldn't campaign for gnomes to get a different take, something more interesting than the crappy typecasting they've gotten. You should totally do both of those things. But those three reasons are why most players won't play them or even outright dislike them, and it's very hard for individual folks (like you and me) to change any of those things. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Why Do People Hate Gnomes?
Top