Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Maxperson" data-source="post: 9032647" data-attributes="member: 23751">It looks the same as the traditional game [USER=7027139]@loverdrive[/USER] mentioned.&nbsp; She claimed that it doesn't matter that 99.9% of traditional DMs run the game as the rules and guidelines state and don't run an adversarial game where they drop 50,000 liches on the group in order to invalidate their skill. If .001% of extreme bad faith DMs run their games this way, player skill doesn't exist.That statement applies to no myth as well.&nbsp; It doesn't matter if 99.9% of no myth DMs run the game in accordance with the rules, becPlease note that I don't believe either one of those things.&nbsp; She has been very wrong about the subject of player skill in D&amp;D games and how traditional games are run for the entire thread(and likely far longer). I'm just pointing out how her argument applies to her style of game as well as the one she has been poopooing on the entire thread.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Maxperson, post: 9032647, member: 23751"] It looks the same as the traditional game [USER=7027139]@loverdrive[/USER] mentioned. She claimed that it doesn't matter that 99.9% of traditional DMs run the game as the rules and guidelines state and don't run an adversarial game where they drop 50,000 liches on the group in order to invalidate their skill. If .001% of extreme bad faith DMs run their games this way, player skill doesn't exist. That statement applies to no myth as well. It doesn't matter if 99.9% of no myth DMs run the game in accordance with the rules, bec Please note that I don't believe either one of those things. She has been very wrong about the subject of player skill in D&D games and how traditional games are run for the entire thread(and likely far longer). I'm just pointing out how her argument applies to her style of game as well as the one she has been poopooing on the entire thread. [/QUOTE]

Verification