Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Why do RPGs have rules?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="loverdrive" data-source="post: 9044511" data-attributes="member: 7027139"><p>To put a discussion of simulationism aside (maybe it should be moved to another thread?), I have this theory that I've jokingly called it Super Theory of Super Everything, and I keep postponing putting it to paper.</p><p></p><p>So.</p><p></p><p>There's an infinite set E, that contains everything, <em>everything</em>, Super Everything possible in a roleplaying game, from defeating princesses to rescuing dragons to finding love to getting shot in the face to randomly dying from complications of teeth cavities. If you can think of it, it is included in E.</p><p></p><p>There's an infinite set S that contains everything possible in a particular system. Let's suppose there's an event <em>o, o </em>∈ S, but<em> o </em>∉ E. So, the system allows for a thing that is not possible in roleplaying game. Yeah, impossible, so S⊂E, or, in other words, a system cannot grant you any more freedom that you already have, only take it away. Chat calls it Loverdrive Theorem, and I am egotistical enough to accept such name.</p><p></p><p>Why do RPGs have rules then?</p><p></p><p>There's a subset G of E, that includes everything that <em>you know you do want</em>. Things that you are excited about. You can just, like, have those things. Introduce them directly, will them into existence: that's how ERP works. You don't need no rules for that, but it is possible for G\S to exist, things that you do want, but are not possible within the system. In mathematic terms, such scenario is called "this sucks on ice", and if G⊂S, it's called "woohoo, we have the bare minimum, who cares?".</p><p></p><p>Why do RPGs have rules then?</p><p></p><p>There's a subset B of E, things that you <em>don't</em> want. You also can, like, just not have those things, will them out of existence: that's how ERP works. But, unlike G, there's a good scenario. When B⊄S, when the system doesn't allow for things you don't want, great! You don't have to worry about them and can pursue G without a care in the world.</p><p></p><p>Why do RPGs have the rules then? To exclude B. To remove a need to care about #### you don't want so you can chase the high of G. Seek for a G-spot, if you will.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="loverdrive, post: 9044511, member: 7027139"] To put a discussion of simulationism aside (maybe it should be moved to another thread?), I have this theory that I've jokingly called it Super Theory of Super Everything, and I keep postponing putting it to paper. So. There's an infinite set E, that contains everything, [I]everything[/I], Super Everything possible in a roleplaying game, from defeating princesses to rescuing dragons to finding love to getting shot in the face to randomly dying from complications of teeth cavities. If you can think of it, it is included in E. There's an infinite set S that contains everything possible in a particular system. Let's suppose there's an event [I]o, o [/I]∈ S, but[I] o [/I]∉ E. So, the system allows for a thing that is not possible in roleplaying game. Yeah, impossible, so S⊂E, or, in other words, a system cannot grant you any more freedom that you already have, only take it away. Chat calls it Loverdrive Theorem, and I am egotistical enough to accept such name. Why do RPGs have rules then? There's a subset G of E, that includes everything that [I]you know you do want[/I]. Things that you are excited about. You can just, like, have those things. Introduce them directly, will them into existence: that's how ERP works. You don't need no rules for that, but it is possible for G\S to exist, things that you do want, but are not possible within the system. In mathematic terms, such scenario is called "this sucks on ice", and if G⊂S, it's called "woohoo, we have the bare minimum, who cares?". Why do RPGs have rules then? There's a subset B of E, things that you [I]don't[/I] want. You also can, like, just not have those things, will them out of existence: that's how ERP works. But, unlike G, there's a good scenario. When B⊄S, when the system doesn't allow for things you don't want, great! You don't have to worry about them and can pursue G without a care in the world. Why do RPGs have the rules then? To exclude B. To remove a need to care about #### you don't want so you can chase the high of G. Seek for a G-spot, if you will. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Why do RPGs have rules?
Top