Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Why do RPGs have rules?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Manbearcat" data-source="post: 9077136" data-attributes="member: 6696971"><p>Yes, its 4 AM and I have absolutely no business being up or posting. </p><p></p><p>I'm going to go with a different tact here. Forget Mouse Guard for the moment. I'm hoping this might do some work to clarify some of the aspects of our exchange (and the differences between what we're describing) because it will bear a resemblance to a sandbox game while simultaneously pointing to some pretty significant differences.</p><p></p><p>This is the very first Faction/Setting Clock in the last Blades in the Dark game:</p><p></p><p>[ATTACH=full]290960[/ATTACH]</p><p></p><p><strong>WHY WAS THIS FACTION CLOCK IN PLAY? </strong> Because the players chose key advances in their building of their Crew that brought them positive faction with The Red Sashes (TRS) and negative faction with The Lampblacks. This connecting to these factions via Crew build signals that the players want early play to be about the default BitD milieu of these two gangs at war:</p><p></p><p>[ATTACH=full]290961[/ATTACH]</p><p></p><p>This is out in the open. This isn't secret backstory. This is "table-facing." And the Crew and PC creation process establish early threats, potential alliances, friends, contacts, rivals, lair (among other things). Early play engages these choices and things snowball and branch out as players use the Info Gathering/Free Play phase to develop a prospective Score > Score phase to resolve the Score and change the situation > Payoff & Downtime to earn Coin, accrue Heat, deal with Entanglements, Recover, Train, Indulge Vice, Acquire Assets, perform Longterm Projects.</p><p></p><p>The PCs and Crew don't just have Downtime. The Factions and Setting components that they (the players) bring on-screen via their build choices and actions undertaken during the other phases of play also have Downtime. And its my job as GM to (a) give expression to this within the imagined space of play (Mylera Klev is demanding further alliance in the war against The Lampblacks...pick a side damnit) and (b) mechanize that using the rules of play (6 tick clock, 2d6 because TRS is Tier 2, usage of The Faction system and the threat of the hardship of At War status looming, inevitable situation framing + consequence-space + Devil's Bargains being impacted by the player decisions and resolution with this).</p><p></p><p>[HR][/HR]</p><p></p><p>This feeds into decision-points > which feeds into resolution > which feeds into changed gamestate, changed setting, new situations > loop back to decision-points. More conflicts with more Factions spreading like wildfire. Setting changes like Forgotten Goddesses being summoned back into this broken world leading to heresies and inquisitions. And all of it out-in-the-open. All of it systematized via a transparent, stable, encoded for all to see game engine. By the time things are done a year later, you have a Duskvol that is profoundly different than when it started along with profoundly changed Crew and PCs which shape all of that action, all of that change.</p><p></p><p>My job (as GM) is to follow their lead, bring Duskvol and the game's engine to life via the process of that lead-following meeting the deployment of my own creative capacities while relentlessly following the agenda, adhering without fail to the principles, rules, and application of (again; out-in-the-open) system.</p><p></p><p>* I don't get to deviate from their lead and introduce whatever crap I want to (such as situation-framing that is unresponsive to players or introducing Setting or Faction Clocks that have nothing to do with play-to-date or are secret backstory that I shouldn't be employing in the first place)</p><p></p><p>* I don't get to have an off-week to bring sterile, conflict-neutral situation framing or boring Devil's Bargains or fictionally-feckless, mechanically-toothless consequences to their actions or to idly stand by and watch them free play affectation and performative color and goal-less wandering and setting-touring. I have to bring "lead-following antagonism"...hard...and correct...every session. Players say "punch me here please;" I punch them there. We find out how they handle the punch and what their swingback does.</p><p></p><p>* I don't get to deviate from the codified agenda and principles at any moment.</p><p></p><p>* I don't get to suspend rules, structure, or the application of system (for any purpose, especially for the purpose of some kind of story imperatives that I shouldn't have in the first place).</p><p></p><p>* I don't get to hide stuff. Its all out there.</p><p></p><p></p><p>If all of that sounds like your game...well, then you're running a sandbox that is very much like Blades in the Dark. If not, then whatever differences you see when contrasted with the above should hopefully be clear.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Manbearcat, post: 9077136, member: 6696971"] Yes, its 4 AM and I have absolutely no business being up or posting. I'm going to go with a different tact here. Forget Mouse Guard for the moment. I'm hoping this might do some work to clarify some of the aspects of our exchange (and the differences between what we're describing) because it will bear a resemblance to a sandbox game while simultaneously pointing to some pretty significant differences. This is the very first Faction/Setting Clock in the last Blades in the Dark game: [ATTACH type="full" alt="1690357057838.png"]290960[/ATTACH] [B]WHY WAS THIS FACTION CLOCK IN PLAY? [/B] Because the players chose key advances in their building of their Crew that brought them positive faction with The Red Sashes (TRS) and negative faction with The Lampblacks. This connecting to these factions via Crew build signals that the players want early play to be about the default BitD milieu of these two gangs at war: [ATTACH type="full" alt="1690357679837.png"]290961[/ATTACH] This is out in the open. This isn't secret backstory. This is "table-facing." And the Crew and PC creation process establish early threats, potential alliances, friends, contacts, rivals, lair (among other things). Early play engages these choices and things snowball and branch out as players use the Info Gathering/Free Play phase to develop a prospective Score > Score phase to resolve the Score and change the situation > Payoff & Downtime to earn Coin, accrue Heat, deal with Entanglements, Recover, Train, Indulge Vice, Acquire Assets, perform Longterm Projects. The PCs and Crew don't just have Downtime. The Factions and Setting components that they (the players) bring on-screen via their build choices and actions undertaken during the other phases of play also have Downtime. And its my job as GM to (a) give expression to this within the imagined space of play (Mylera Klev is demanding further alliance in the war against The Lampblacks...pick a side damnit) and (b) mechanize that using the rules of play (6 tick clock, 2d6 because TRS is Tier 2, usage of The Faction system and the threat of the hardship of At War status looming, inevitable situation framing + consequence-space + Devil's Bargains being impacted by the player decisions and resolution with this). [HR][/HR] This feeds into decision-points > which feeds into resolution > which feeds into changed gamestate, changed setting, new situations > loop back to decision-points. More conflicts with more Factions spreading like wildfire. Setting changes like Forgotten Goddesses being summoned back into this broken world leading to heresies and inquisitions. And all of it out-in-the-open. All of it systematized via a transparent, stable, encoded for all to see game engine. By the time things are done a year later, you have a Duskvol that is profoundly different than when it started along with profoundly changed Crew and PCs which shape all of that action, all of that change. My job (as GM) is to follow their lead, bring Duskvol and the game's engine to life via the process of that lead-following meeting the deployment of my own creative capacities while relentlessly following the agenda, adhering without fail to the principles, rules, and application of (again; out-in-the-open) system. * I don't get to deviate from their lead and introduce whatever crap I want to (such as situation-framing that is unresponsive to players or introducing Setting or Faction Clocks that have nothing to do with play-to-date or are secret backstory that I shouldn't be employing in the first place) * I don't get to have an off-week to bring sterile, conflict-neutral situation framing or boring Devil's Bargains or fictionally-feckless, mechanically-toothless consequences to their actions or to idly stand by and watch them free play affectation and performative color and goal-less wandering and setting-touring. I have to bring "lead-following antagonism"...hard...and correct...every session. Players say "punch me here please;" I punch them there. We find out how they handle the punch and what their swingback does. * I don't get to deviate from the codified agenda and principles at any moment. * I don't get to suspend rules, structure, or the application of system (for any purpose, especially for the purpose of some kind of story imperatives that I shouldn't have in the first place). * I don't get to hide stuff. Its all out there. If all of that sounds like your game...well, then you're running a sandbox that is very much like Blades in the Dark. If not, then whatever differences you see when contrasted with the above should hopefully be clear. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Why do RPGs have rules?
Top