Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Psion" data-source="post: 3244760" data-attributes="member: 172">Or, perhaps the answer is somewhere in-between. Perhaps they didn't want the human advantage to make a class with one skill total on par with the next more skilled class.More likely, designers were just simplifying their choices. I can see how going in one-point steps might have been a bit fidgety.For similar reasons, I disdain ad hoc save progressions in third party products. I think a third save progression would be good, but I look at the ad hoc save progressions and think to myself the author is essentially splitting hairs on a level where balancing is really not too sensible.</blockquote>