Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
Why do we need to be "wow"ed?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Hijinks" data-source="post: 2439922" data-attributes="member: 31094"><p>Over the weekend I watched <em>Troy</em> on DVD. I hadn't rented it before because a.) I don't watch movies just because beautiful people are in it (although HELLO Eric Bana!!), b.) I'm not that into historical battle movies, and c.) I managed to avoid reading any Homer in high school or college, and figured I'd be better off reading that before watching the movie. But then I decided what the hey, it's just a movie for entertainment purposes. So I watched it.</p><p> </p><p>Now, I had remembered people saying it was horrible, and nasty bad, and all sorts of things, but I didn't hate it (the only movie I specifically thought was mule puke in recent memory was "Dungeons and Dragons"). It was entertaining, as Hollywood films are meant to be. Granted, I didn't have the basis of the literature to be going by, so I just watched it and enjoyed it and mailed it back to Netflix when it was done.</p><p> </p><p>Then because I was bored at work (shh!) I went to Netflix to read the reviews written by other viewers of this movie, because I was wondering why people thought it was so bad. It just seemed odd to me that people posted such reviews, as though the movie personally affronted them individually as human beings. One person posted that they didn't like it because it didn't fit the literature, which I can understand; if you enjoy a piece of literature, you want the film version to at least follow along.</p><p> </p><p>However, some reviewers seemed so, well, angry at the movie. They said it was horrible and the acting was bad (I'm paraphrasing; they were much more effluent than this). I didn't think it was that bad for what it was: a Hollywood film designed to make money for the stars and the studio.</p><p> </p><p>So now I wonder: why do we need to be "wow"ed by a movie to consider it a good movie? Why can't a movie just entertain? Why do folks get so bent out of shape about a movie? I mean, if I went to the theater (which I rarely do), I might perhaps get angrier if I went to see a movie that failed to entertain. But I rent through Netflix most of the time, and if I don't feel entertained by a flick, I turn it off. I guess I just see it as a symptom of modern American society that we feel that if a movie didn't "wow" us with its actors/actresses, its special effects, and its plot, that we get angry about it. I've seen reviews on this board as well where people seemed personally affronted by films, and it always made me wonder.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Hijinks, post: 2439922, member: 31094"] Over the weekend I watched [i]Troy[/i] on DVD. I hadn't rented it before because a.) I don't watch movies just because beautiful people are in it (although HELLO Eric Bana!!), b.) I'm not that into historical battle movies, and c.) I managed to avoid reading any Homer in high school or college, and figured I'd be better off reading that before watching the movie. But then I decided what the hey, it's just a movie for entertainment purposes. So I watched it. Now, I had remembered people saying it was horrible, and nasty bad, and all sorts of things, but I didn't hate it (the only movie I specifically thought was mule puke in recent memory was "Dungeons and Dragons"). It was entertaining, as Hollywood films are meant to be. Granted, I didn't have the basis of the literature to be going by, so I just watched it and enjoyed it and mailed it back to Netflix when it was done. Then because I was bored at work (shh!) I went to Netflix to read the reviews written by other viewers of this movie, because I was wondering why people thought it was so bad. It just seemed odd to me that people posted such reviews, as though the movie personally affronted them individually as human beings. One person posted that they didn't like it because it didn't fit the literature, which I can understand; if you enjoy a piece of literature, you want the film version to at least follow along. However, some reviewers seemed so, well, angry at the movie. They said it was horrible and the acting was bad (I'm paraphrasing; they were much more effluent than this). I didn't think it was that bad for what it was: a Hollywood film designed to make money for the stars and the studio. So now I wonder: why do we need to be "wow"ed by a movie to consider it a good movie? Why can't a movie just entertain? Why do folks get so bent out of shape about a movie? I mean, if I went to the theater (which I rarely do), I might perhaps get angrier if I went to see a movie that failed to entertain. But I rent through Netflix most of the time, and if I don't feel entertained by a flick, I turn it off. I guess I just see it as a symptom of modern American society that we feel that if a movie didn't "wow" us with its actors/actresses, its special effects, and its plot, that we get angry about it. I've seen reviews on this board as well where people seemed personally affronted by films, and it always made me wonder. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
Why do we need to be "wow"ed?
Top