Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Why do we really need HP to represent things other than physical injuries?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Crazy Jerome" data-source="post: 5827923" data-attributes="member: 54877"><p>Yes. And then throw in-combat healing into the mix, and we have the other part of hit points, which is a combat pacing mechanic--to deliberately extend the combats longer than they otherwise would be while avoiding the extreme swings of a system where this is relegated to parries or dodges. We can argue about particular implementations of this pacing as too fast or too slow, but the "hit points are physical damage only" idea is ignoring this key piece of D&D at peril.</p><p> </p><p>After all, RuneQuest <strong>has</strong> hit points as only physical damage, with parries and dodges, precisely to throw out this pacing. And you know how RQ fights go? It's all fun and games for a second or two, no one is appreciably hurt, then someone loses an eye. Grandma told you not to run around with ducks waving giant cleavers. Then someone gets a crossbow bolt or spear in the gut, and party over. As an optional, much grittier module for D&D, that kind of thing might have a place. But it is not the base D&D, and never should be.</p><p> </p><p>Now, I'd say a more valid argument is along the lines, OK, hit points are physical damage, luck, morale, fatigue--already a lot of stuff--and now you want to tell me they are plot protection and combat pacing on top of all that? No wonder they have holes. They are trying to do too much. </p><p> </p><p>If you then want to replicate the plot protection and combat pacing through some other means (almost assuredly metagaming mechanics if they are not to be too intrusive), then hit points could be nothing but damage/fatigue, and a breaking out into two scores wouldn't hurt too much, now that plot protection and combat pacing are not interacting wonkily with them. However, generally I've found that people that are most serious about hit points as physical wounds are not at all interested in something like a pool of action points or the like turning hits into misses, either. Plus, these systems tend to be slower to adjudicate than D&D hit points. So I guess I'd say the burden is to determine how you would replicate the plot protection and combat placing, rather than assuming that they don't matter.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Crazy Jerome, post: 5827923, member: 54877"] Yes. And then throw in-combat healing into the mix, and we have the other part of hit points, which is a combat pacing mechanic--to deliberately extend the combats longer than they otherwise would be while avoiding the extreme swings of a system where this is relegated to parries or dodges. We can argue about particular implementations of this pacing as too fast or too slow, but the "hit points are physical damage only" idea is ignoring this key piece of D&D at peril. After all, RuneQuest [B]has[/B] hit points as only physical damage, with parries and dodges, precisely to throw out this pacing. And you know how RQ fights go? It's all fun and games for a second or two, no one is appreciably hurt, then someone loses an eye. Grandma told you not to run around with ducks waving giant cleavers. Then someone gets a crossbow bolt or spear in the gut, and party over. As an optional, much grittier module for D&D, that kind of thing might have a place. But it is not the base D&D, and never should be. Now, I'd say a more valid argument is along the lines, OK, hit points are physical damage, luck, morale, fatigue--already a lot of stuff--and now you want to tell me they are plot protection and combat pacing on top of all that? No wonder they have holes. They are trying to do too much. If you then want to replicate the plot protection and combat pacing through some other means (almost assuredly metagaming mechanics if they are not to be too intrusive), then hit points could be nothing but damage/fatigue, and a breaking out into two scores wouldn't hurt too much, now that plot protection and combat pacing are not interacting wonkily with them. However, generally I've found that people that are most serious about hit points as physical wounds are not at all interested in something like a pool of action points or the like turning hits into misses, either. Plus, these systems tend to be slower to adjudicate than D&D hit points. So I guess I'd say the burden is to determine how you would replicate the plot protection and combat placing, rather than assuming that they don't matter. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Why do we really need HP to represent things other than physical injuries?
Top