Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Hussar" data-source="post: 5833803" data-attributes="member: 22779">That's actually not true.  While there might be problems if you are very specific in your description ("The arrow plunges deep into your shoulder"), most of the time it's not really a problem (The arrow slams into your armor, causing lots of bruising, but you don't think anything is broken).Even in the case where the character goes down ("The troll slams into your with it's huge club, Sir Billingsley crashes to the ground with a sickening thud!") is still fairly easy to narrate ("But, the blow, despite it's power, merely winded you, and you drag yourself to your feet badly battered!")I mean, you only have to look at genre fiction to see thousands of examples of a character taking hits and either fighting through them, or, even after being brought down, shaking his head, standing back up, and keeping going.And this is where the problem with HP=Physical Damage 100% comes in.  In that model, anything that drops you below zero hp is always a serious wound.  You can't just stand up afterward.  Unless, of course, the cleric makes it better.  Which removes from the game lots of the very exciting scenes that you see in all sorts of action movies where the good guy or bad guy, gets up after being knocked down.In LotR, when Frodo get's tagged by the Cave Troll (in the movie I'm talking about), you cannot do that scene with the HP=Physical Damage model.  Frodo dropped, and certainly not from any non-lethal attack.  Without a cleric, he bleeds to death most of the time, or, even if he's helped by friends, he's not standing up without serious bedrest.In Empire Strikes Back, when the Wampus knocks Luke down and takes him out, you can't have the rest of the scene using 3e style HP mechanics.  It doesn't work.  Luke either bleeds to death, or, he's conscious but below 0 HP, which means he cannot fight, let alone escape.Yes, there are corner cases where you can find the "Schrodinger's Wounds" issue.  But, that's almost always caused by DM's being too specific in their descriptions of wounds when it's both unnecessary to be that specific and most likely very unrealistic.  In a game where it's perfectly reasonable for a high level fighter to take on an elephant with a sword, are you really going to get hung up on this for realism?</blockquote>

Verification