Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Why do you hate meta-gaming? (And what does it mean to you?)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Big J Money" data-source="post: 6809374" data-attributes="member: 70533"><p>These are good example, so I'll start here</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>1) This is an implausible description of a person's roleplaying. If it's already been stated that a dragon is present, then to say it's not (without explanation, such as the dragon being invisible, or imaginary in the first place, etc, etc) contradicts what was said before.</p><p></p><p>2) Another implausible description. This could be corrected simply by coming up with a reason why your character might have heard a legend about an Aboleth.</p><p></p><p>3) Not implausible at all as described, but likely cheating (I'll clarify what I mean by cheating below). </p><p></p><p>4) I'm sure whether I'm understanding this one; what are the implications of it scouting ahead? That it will avoid danger or be put in harm's way to upset the player? If it's the former, then it isn't even meta-gaming because it's perfectly reasonable for the party to wish that their druid's companion stay safe. Again, I might not have understood this.</p><p></p><p>Aside from #4, which I'm unsure of until it's clarified, sure 1-3 can be defined as meta-gaming. But that isn't what makes them bad. What makes them bad is that they either create an implausible and inconsistent reality, or they're cheating against the gaming group's sensibilities.</p><p></p><p><strong>Cheating</strong> is subjective; it's defined by each playing group. If I'm DMing a campaign, then my expectations (which I would ask the group beforehand if they are correct expectations) might be 1) that monsters from a particular sourcebook remain secret, 2) that adventure modules remain secret, and 3) that characters will face risk during encounters, and this risk is not to be avoided purely by OOC knowledge (i.e. meta-gaming is fine as long as it's not abused as a method of cheating)</p><p></p><p>However, I might just as easily run a campaign where myself and the rest of the group doesn't care if some of the players have knowledge from a monster sourcebook where I draw encounters from. In that case, using their OOC knowledge to avoid risks against the monsters would not be considered cheating.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Big J Money, post: 6809374, member: 70533"] These are good example, so I'll start here 1) This is an implausible description of a person's roleplaying. If it's already been stated that a dragon is present, then to say it's not (without explanation, such as the dragon being invisible, or imaginary in the first place, etc, etc) contradicts what was said before. 2) Another implausible description. This could be corrected simply by coming up with a reason why your character might have heard a legend about an Aboleth. 3) Not implausible at all as described, but likely cheating (I'll clarify what I mean by cheating below). 4) I'm sure whether I'm understanding this one; what are the implications of it scouting ahead? That it will avoid danger or be put in harm's way to upset the player? If it's the former, then it isn't even meta-gaming because it's perfectly reasonable for the party to wish that their druid's companion stay safe. Again, I might not have understood this. Aside from #4, which I'm unsure of until it's clarified, sure 1-3 can be defined as meta-gaming. But that isn't what makes them bad. What makes them bad is that they either create an implausible and inconsistent reality, or they're cheating against the gaming group's sensibilities. [B]Cheating[/B] is subjective; it's defined by each playing group. If I'm DMing a campaign, then my expectations (which I would ask the group beforehand if they are correct expectations) might be 1) that monsters from a particular sourcebook remain secret, 2) that adventure modules remain secret, and 3) that characters will face risk during encounters, and this risk is not to be avoided purely by OOC knowledge (i.e. meta-gaming is fine as long as it's not abused as a method of cheating) However, I might just as easily run a campaign where myself and the rest of the group doesn't care if some of the players have knowledge from a monster sourcebook where I draw encounters from. In that case, using their OOC knowledge to avoid risks against the monsters would not be considered cheating. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Why do you hate meta-gaming? (And what does it mean to you?)
Top