Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="payn" data-source="post: 8681926" data-attributes="member: 90374">I'm a 3E/PF1 guy, so naturally I love multi-classing. It's a little more manageable in 5E though. I dont get too bogged down in the details of why a multiclass character came about narratively. I view leveling pretty much under the hood. So, putting together a unique blend of abilities allows me to build my own class. I like systems that tie in the background to make it feel a little more organic, but often find these features to be wanting. I think bounded accuracy helps make more sense of the setting in general, so 5E likely does multiclassing better in this approach of D&amp;D than previous editions.I'm not opposed to single classing either. Whatever seems to fit my imagination for the campaign is what I go with. I do vastly prefer systems that allow a full range of multiclass choice. So, systems like 4E and PF2, are kind of a bummer for me in the multiclassing department. YMMV</blockquote>

[QUOTE="payn, post: 8681926, member: 90374"] I'm a 3E/PF1 guy, so naturally I love multi-classing. It's a little more manageable in 5E though. I dont get too bogged down in the details of why a multiclass character came about narratively. I view leveling pretty much under the hood. So, putting together a unique blend of abilities allows me to build my own class. I like systems that tie in the background to make it feel a little more organic, but often find these features to be wanting. I think bounded accuracy helps make more sense of the setting in general, so 5E likely does multiclassing better in this approach of D&D than previous editions. I'm not opposed to single classing either. Whatever seems to fit my imagination for the campaign is what I go with. I do vastly prefer systems that allow a full range of multiclass choice. So, systems like 4E and PF2, are kind of a bummer for me in the multiclassing department. YMMV [/QUOTE]

Verification