Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Why do you multiclass?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="pming" data-source="post: 6747064" data-attributes="member: 45197"><p>Hiya!</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>The difference is that the Players don't have the same..."role"...in the game as the DM does. The DM is the one in charge of the campaign world. If the DM decides there is no MC'ing or Feats in his campaign, then that's the way it is. If a Player decides to play a Wizard in that campaign, that's the way it is. If course the DM <em>could</em> also say..."And no Wizards". BUT...the player couldn't say..."Too bad, I'm playing a Wizard and then I'm going to MC with Paladin later". Because deciding campaign structure isn't his "role" in the game.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I'd rather not, seeing as they are two different things. Wizard is a core class. Multiclassing is an OPTIONAL <em>rule</em>. But, just to play along, if I did hate wizards and said "no wizards"...</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Uh, no? Yes? Yes? Maybe? I'm the DM. If I don't like wizards or shortswords, <em>I'm allowed to remove them from my campaign world and game</em>. Just like a player is allowed to say "Oh, I love shortsword wielding wizards...I'm gonna find another game, sorry". No harm, no foul. Different strokes for different folk</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Ok, this is getting weird... But ok...I'm not one to shirk away for weirdness! <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" /> If I HAVE to eat a meal that I am cooking, I'm not going to cook a meal made with potatoes or tomatoes. It's that simple. I'll cook something with rice and eggplants then. If someone LOVES potatoes and tomatoes, he/she is free to stay at home and cook their own meal. Someone could bring their own pot of mashed potatoes and a fresh tomato to slice up for themselves...just as long as I don't have to eat it. <em><strong>However</strong></em>, a RPG isn't an "everyone can play by different rules" game; everyone plays by the same one (re: everyone eats the same meal). Those rules are determined by the DM (or the cook). If the DM doesn't like something, he/she can nix it from his/her campaign (or not cook with them).</p><p></p><p>It's not about "I like it so I should be allowed". It's about how the DM and Player dichotomy works. The DM is the one who has to decide what is best for his/her campaign. And a grumpy DM who hates three of the 6 PC's because they all are MC'ed...well, it's not likely to be a <em>"...and a good time was had by all..."</em> type of game.</p><p></p><p>^_^</p><p></p><p>Paul L. Ming</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="pming, post: 6747064, member: 45197"] Hiya! The difference is that the Players don't have the same..."role"...in the game as the DM does. The DM is the one in charge of the campaign world. If the DM decides there is no MC'ing or Feats in his campaign, then that's the way it is. If a Player decides to play a Wizard in that campaign, that's the way it is. If course the DM [I]could[/I] also say..."And no Wizards". BUT...the player couldn't say..."Too bad, I'm playing a Wizard and then I'm going to MC with Paladin later". Because deciding campaign structure isn't his "role" in the game. I'd rather not, seeing as they are two different things. Wizard is a core class. Multiclassing is an OPTIONAL [I]rule[/I]. But, just to play along, if I did hate wizards and said "no wizards"... Uh, no? Yes? Yes? Maybe? I'm the DM. If I don't like wizards or shortswords, [I]I'm allowed to remove them from my campaign world and game[/I]. Just like a player is allowed to say "Oh, I love shortsword wielding wizards...I'm gonna find another game, sorry". No harm, no foul. Different strokes for different folk Ok, this is getting weird... But ok...I'm not one to shirk away for weirdness! ;) If I HAVE to eat a meal that I am cooking, I'm not going to cook a meal made with potatoes or tomatoes. It's that simple. I'll cook something with rice and eggplants then. If someone LOVES potatoes and tomatoes, he/she is free to stay at home and cook their own meal. Someone could bring their own pot of mashed potatoes and a fresh tomato to slice up for themselves...just as long as I don't have to eat it. [I][B]However[/B][/I], a RPG isn't an "everyone can play by different rules" game; everyone plays by the same one (re: everyone eats the same meal). Those rules are determined by the DM (or the cook). If the DM doesn't like something, he/she can nix it from his/her campaign (or not cook with them). It's not about "I like it so I should be allowed". It's about how the DM and Player dichotomy works. The DM is the one who has to decide what is best for his/her campaign. And a grumpy DM who hates three of the 6 PC's because they all are MC'ed...well, it's not likely to be a [I]"...and a good time was had by all..."[/I] type of game. ^_^ Paul L. Ming [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Why do you multiclass?
Top