Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Million Dollar TTRPG Crowdfunders
Most Anticipated Tabletop RPGs Of The Year
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Why do you think the Bard gets no play?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Spatzimaus" data-source="post: 3511819" data-attributes="member: 3051"><p>In most AD&D campaigns I played, no one wanted to play the Thief. It's just not FUN to be sitting there making percentage rolls while the other players twiddle their thumbs. Same went for the Cleric; no one wanted to be a walking Band-Aid when they could be something flashier.</p><p>So, the DMs had only a few options. Offer "incentives" to play those classes (an extra level for the thief!); provide an NPC; or, worst case, design the adventures such that the lack of a certain class (thief) wouldn't cripple the party.</p><p></p><p>Fast forward to 3E. Being a Cleric is pretty good, thanks to the domains. Being a Rogue is pretty good, thanks to Sneak Attack and Tumble. But now, it seems that no one wants to be the "front man", the CHA-centric character who takes all those social skills. They either want to be able to "roleplay" every NPC encounter in a way that negates their characters' low CHA/skills, or simply do without those sorts of checks.</p><p></p><p>Bottom line: don't let them get away with it. If the party is consistently running into encounters that require diplomacy and finesse, don't let the CHA 8 Fighter do the talking. Or if he does, make sure that the players fail spectacularly, and leave no doubt whose fault it was. In the core rules, the only classes that can really excel at social skills are the Bard and Rogue, and the Bard definitely is better at it. If the players have reason to believe these roles will be absolutely <em>needed</em> by the party, they'll value them more.</p><p></p><p>The Bard is a fine class, as-is. It can fight, it has plenty of skills, it can cast <em>mass haste</em> and it can heal in a pinch. The spellcasting is spontaneous (low maintenance!), and covers a wide range of useful abilities. The class even gets a few nice non-spell abilities (the songs).</p><p>It's almost the only core class my friends and I have never heavily modified (we left the Fighter alone); the only changes we've ever made:</p><p>> We tweaked the spell list (remove the healing spells and add some extra <em>protection from whatever</em> spells to compensate)</p><p>> We made the "cast in light armor" change before 3.5E did.</p><p>> And finally, we changed the spellcasting bonus; instead of high CHA giving extra spells per day, we changed it to extra spells KNOWN. (Only <em>permanent</em> sources of CHA counted for this, though.)</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Spatzimaus, post: 3511819, member: 3051"] In most AD&D campaigns I played, no one wanted to play the Thief. It's just not FUN to be sitting there making percentage rolls while the other players twiddle their thumbs. Same went for the Cleric; no one wanted to be a walking Band-Aid when they could be something flashier. So, the DMs had only a few options. Offer "incentives" to play those classes (an extra level for the thief!); provide an NPC; or, worst case, design the adventures such that the lack of a certain class (thief) wouldn't cripple the party. Fast forward to 3E. Being a Cleric is pretty good, thanks to the domains. Being a Rogue is pretty good, thanks to Sneak Attack and Tumble. But now, it seems that no one wants to be the "front man", the CHA-centric character who takes all those social skills. They either want to be able to "roleplay" every NPC encounter in a way that negates their characters' low CHA/skills, or simply do without those sorts of checks. Bottom line: don't let them get away with it. If the party is consistently running into encounters that require diplomacy and finesse, don't let the CHA 8 Fighter do the talking. Or if he does, make sure that the players fail spectacularly, and leave no doubt whose fault it was. In the core rules, the only classes that can really excel at social skills are the Bard and Rogue, and the Bard definitely is better at it. If the players have reason to believe these roles will be absolutely [i]needed[/i] by the party, they'll value them more. The Bard is a fine class, as-is. It can fight, it has plenty of skills, it can cast [i]mass haste[/i] and it can heal in a pinch. The spellcasting is spontaneous (low maintenance!), and covers a wide range of useful abilities. The class even gets a few nice non-spell abilities (the songs). It's almost the only core class my friends and I have never heavily modified (we left the Fighter alone); the only changes we've ever made: > We tweaked the spell list (remove the healing spells and add some extra [i]protection from whatever[/i] spells to compensate) > We made the "cast in light armor" change before 3.5E did. > And finally, we changed the spellcasting bonus; instead of high CHA giving extra spells per day, we changed it to extra spells KNOWN. (Only [i]permanent[/i] sources of CHA counted for this, though.) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Why do you think the Bard gets no play?
Top