Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="KingCrab" data-source="post: 3735213" data-attributes="member: 40713">Because I want to give up on a system I've played and loved for quite some time in exchange for one they're making up on the fly without enough time to decently playtest.  <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f600.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":D" title="Big grin    :D"  data-smilie="8"data-shortname=":D" />  Seriously though, the one thing I am excited about is the fact that they mentioned alignment will be playing less of an active role.  Alignment is a tricky concept and rarely can two players agree on where the lines should be drawn.  I'm supposing they finally realized this and I'm hoping they're taking it out of the spell and item mechanics.I also like what they've said about magic items being less essential to the characters (though the recent talk of such items being included in the players guide seems to contradict what they've already said).I like the idea of releasing a PHB(x) and DMG(x) every year for a reasonably growing core, though only if they limit the number of side books they're adding stuff too. That's about it.  I'm gonna miss 3.5.</blockquote>