Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Why does D&D still have 16th to 20th level?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Li Shenron" data-source="post: 8310012" data-attributes="member: 1465"><p>The number of levels could be lower or higher as well, there is really no ultimate perfect number for a RPG. I think they went with 20 in 5e only because the current edition wanted to use 3e as a starting point for a few things at least, including class format and spellcasting. They certainly didn't want to leave Wish or Meteor Swarm out.</p><p></p><p>There are 2 separate but correlated aspects to consider: level spacing and top abilities. </p><p></p><p>Which top abilities are included in the game is what really determines the kind of game you can play. It doesn't matter if you have 10 or 100 levels, it matters instead for example if the top spell for travelling is Misty Step or Astral Projection: that really has an impact on problem solving and therefore what kind of adventures you'll be playing. The stronger the top abilities, the harder the DM's job, but what is better for a designer between not offering an option at all vs offering an option that puts the burden on the DM to work properly? Is it better to have a game that "breaks down" at some point unless you're really a good DM, or a game that doesn't even let you try?</p><p></p><p>Level spacing is another matter and should be used to deliver a wanted feeling of advancement. Fewer levels have the advantage that they make levelling up a major achievement to celebrate. More levels better suit games with micro improvements. 5e designers wanted character abilities to be significant rather than fiddly bits, but at the same time too few levels would mean either too few abilities per character or too big bunches of abilities per level.</p><p></p><p>To get an idea, you can think what would happen if you granted 2 levels at once to your 5e PCs, so that you'd effectively start the game at 2nd, then 4th, 6th... 20th level, but "renamed" those levels to half their values so that players would think their PCs are levels 1-10 (incidentally you would get the benefit that spell level would now match character level!). I think the game would work just fine, but levelling up would be a much bigger deal, and would require more care for players to make on average twice as many character choices when levelling up.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Li Shenron, post: 8310012, member: 1465"] The number of levels could be lower or higher as well, there is really no ultimate perfect number for a RPG. I think they went with 20 in 5e only because the current edition wanted to use 3e as a starting point for a few things at least, including class format and spellcasting. They certainly didn't want to leave Wish or Meteor Swarm out. There are 2 separate but correlated aspects to consider: level spacing and top abilities. Which top abilities are included in the game is what really determines the kind of game you can play. It doesn't matter if you have 10 or 100 levels, it matters instead for example if the top spell for travelling is Misty Step or Astral Projection: that really has an impact on problem solving and therefore what kind of adventures you'll be playing. The stronger the top abilities, the harder the DM's job, but what is better for a designer between not offering an option at all vs offering an option that puts the burden on the DM to work properly? Is it better to have a game that "breaks down" at some point unless you're really a good DM, or a game that doesn't even let you try? Level spacing is another matter and should be used to deliver a wanted feeling of advancement. Fewer levels have the advantage that they make levelling up a major achievement to celebrate. More levels better suit games with micro improvements. 5e designers wanted character abilities to be significant rather than fiddly bits, but at the same time too few levels would mean either too few abilities per character or too big bunches of abilities per level. To get an idea, you can think what would happen if you granted 2 levels at once to your 5e PCs, so that you'd effectively start the game at 2nd, then 4th, 6th... 20th level, but "renamed" those levels to half their values so that players would think their PCs are levels 1-10 (incidentally you would get the benefit that spell level would now match character level!). I think the game would work just fine, but levelling up would be a much bigger deal, and would require more care for players to make on average twice as many character choices when levelling up. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Why does D&D still have 16th to 20th level?
Top