Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Why does no one ever bring up how well designed (and gamist) saving throws were?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Celebrim" data-source="post: 6681696" data-attributes="member: 4937"><p>Well, I don't think it was that they didn't care. They cared, but they weren't thinking in the terms we are thinking in now. Some of the language we employ hadn't even evolved yet.</p><p></p><p>The words I'd use to describe it would be mostly organic and evolved. This is a system that's being built from scratch through play without no prior guide as to what an RPG system is like. New things come up, and they are dealt with on the spot, new ideas jangle around in the back of Gygax's head, and then he gets an opportunity to try to put all this experience he has built up over years as a DM onto paper, and what it ends up looking like is a rules equivalent of a collection of very early airplanes when people weren't exactly sure what shape an airplane needed to have to function well as airplane.</p><p></p><p>The thing is, some of those rules are actually really well built evolved solutions to particular problems. And others are just cobbled together with bailing wire, string, and tape and are pretty ugly. And some are like those planes crashing off the end of the pier in a mass of collapsing struts.</p><p></p><p>But my point about the complexity is that it meant that to analyze the situation while not complicated requires an enormous amount of time, even in an era with modern spreadsheets and scripting out solutions to analyze data. Beyond that, I think all that complexity helped obscure the idea of how you'd go about analyzing it in the first place, or even that you needed to, because everything was created in play and tweaked in play and everyone was used to just relying on their gut. Nobody had the habit of doing the math before hand, and it's not until the 80's that you start to see in Dragon people start advocating for these mathematical models to inform design. That's not to say that I think there is no math and forethought in Gygax, but I don't think even in the 90's that everyone was in the habit of analyzing a system in that fashion. </p><p></p><p>But if you do go read some of those Dragon articles, they are hugely informative and I wish looking back I'd paid more attention to the seemingly boring lists of calculations that people were doing to prove various points. I might have actually produced house rules for 1e coherent enough that I wouldn't have left it eventually in frustration.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Celebrim, post: 6681696, member: 4937"] Well, I don't think it was that they didn't care. They cared, but they weren't thinking in the terms we are thinking in now. Some of the language we employ hadn't even evolved yet. The words I'd use to describe it would be mostly organic and evolved. This is a system that's being built from scratch through play without no prior guide as to what an RPG system is like. New things come up, and they are dealt with on the spot, new ideas jangle around in the back of Gygax's head, and then he gets an opportunity to try to put all this experience he has built up over years as a DM onto paper, and what it ends up looking like is a rules equivalent of a collection of very early airplanes when people weren't exactly sure what shape an airplane needed to have to function well as airplane. The thing is, some of those rules are actually really well built evolved solutions to particular problems. And others are just cobbled together with bailing wire, string, and tape and are pretty ugly. And some are like those planes crashing off the end of the pier in a mass of collapsing struts. But my point about the complexity is that it meant that to analyze the situation while not complicated requires an enormous amount of time, even in an era with modern spreadsheets and scripting out solutions to analyze data. Beyond that, I think all that complexity helped obscure the idea of how you'd go about analyzing it in the first place, or even that you needed to, because everything was created in play and tweaked in play and everyone was used to just relying on their gut. Nobody had the habit of doing the math before hand, and it's not until the 80's that you start to see in Dragon people start advocating for these mathematical models to inform design. That's not to say that I think there is no math and forethought in Gygax, but I don't think even in the 90's that everyone was in the habit of analyzing a system in that fashion. But if you do go read some of those Dragon articles, they are hugely informative and I wish looking back I'd paid more attention to the seemingly boring lists of calculations that people were doing to prove various points. I might have actually produced house rules for 1e coherent enough that I wouldn't have left it eventually in frustration. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Why does no one ever bring up how well designed (and gamist) saving throws were?
Top