Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Why Does spell Reasearch Have Such a High Cost?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Petrosian" data-source="post: 774658" data-attributes="member: 1149"><p>[/B]</p></blockquote><p></p><p></p><p>Hint... swapping the ride skill out for "intimidate" skill for a fighter is not really losing anything. The trait you are swapping out almost BY DEFINITION is one you did not intend to use with that character.</p><p></p><p>In my experience, the above statement is a clear case of hyperbole.</p><p></p><p>First off though, you and i have one glaring difference in our perspectives.</p><p></p><p>You seem to see having for instance 30 spells on the class spell list as more powerful than having 20 spells on the class spell list. As such adding a new spell to you seems to be put in the same framework as actually gaining a new known spell.</p><p></p><p>i don't.</p><p></p><p>In my experience, most casters use less than 20% of the spells on the list. In my experience wizards learn ay most ever (into their spellbooks) at most 50% and frequently much less.</p><p></p><p>A spell you dont knwo is not a power boost.</p><p></p><p>A spell you know, whether by research or by finding a scroll, is replacing another spell you could have known.</p><p></p><p>What matters for power gauging is "I know 10 balancedspells" vs "i know 20 balanced spells" not whether or not they came from PHB, BoEM, TnB, MoF, from the GM's devilish mind or the player's angelic innovations!</p><p></p><p>If a fighter player pre-E&A asked for a "Ac to to-hit" feat akin to expertise in reverse, would he be MORE POWERFUL if i added the feat to the game but his character did not have it yet? Does the character actually beat more monsters based on the fact that later on he might be able to take a feat he couldn't before?</p><p></p><p>NO.</p><p></p><p>He gets more powerful only after the feat is selected and in play.</p><p></p><p>Now, sure, months later the feat is published and becomes official. Do the enemy fighters who never took the feat now become deadlier adversaries because the list of "feast i did not take" is now larger?</p><p></p><p>That is where we differ. At its core, since neither of us is likely to change that perspective. we cannot thus reach an agreement, except to disagree.</p><p></p><p>IMO, increasing the list of "feats i haven't take, skills i haven't known, and spells i haven't learned" is not a power up for the character in question. </p><p></p><p>IMO, increasing the list of "feats i have taken, skills i have , and spells i know" are all power ups but as long as the individual elements remain balanced no more than if "standard" spells were taken...</p><p></p><p>This of course assumes the book spells are balanced which we know is untrue.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>See above.</p><p></p><p>Expanding the class spell list is to me "expanding the list of spells i dont know" if the spell is not added to the character's spell's known. </p><p></p><p>Thats not a significant power up, IMO.</p><p></p><p>We disagree and will continue to do so.</p><p>[/QUOTE]</p>
[QUOTE="Petrosian, post: 774658, member: 1149"] [/B][/QUOTE] Hint... swapping the ride skill out for "intimidate" skill for a fighter is not really losing anything. The trait you are swapping out almost BY DEFINITION is one you did not intend to use with that character. In my experience, the above statement is a clear case of hyperbole. First off though, you and i have one glaring difference in our perspectives. You seem to see having for instance 30 spells on the class spell list as more powerful than having 20 spells on the class spell list. As such adding a new spell to you seems to be put in the same framework as actually gaining a new known spell. i don't. In my experience, most casters use less than 20% of the spells on the list. In my experience wizards learn ay most ever (into their spellbooks) at most 50% and frequently much less. A spell you dont knwo is not a power boost. A spell you know, whether by research or by finding a scroll, is replacing another spell you could have known. What matters for power gauging is "I know 10 balancedspells" vs "i know 20 balanced spells" not whether or not they came from PHB, BoEM, TnB, MoF, from the GM's devilish mind or the player's angelic innovations! If a fighter player pre-E&A asked for a "Ac to to-hit" feat akin to expertise in reverse, would he be MORE POWERFUL if i added the feat to the game but his character did not have it yet? Does the character actually beat more monsters based on the fact that later on he might be able to take a feat he couldn't before? NO. He gets more powerful only after the feat is selected and in play. Now, sure, months later the feat is published and becomes official. Do the enemy fighters who never took the feat now become deadlier adversaries because the list of "feast i did not take" is now larger? That is where we differ. At its core, since neither of us is likely to change that perspective. we cannot thus reach an agreement, except to disagree. IMO, increasing the list of "feats i haven't take, skills i haven't known, and spells i haven't learned" is not a power up for the character in question. IMO, increasing the list of "feats i have taken, skills i have , and spells i know" are all power ups but as long as the individual elements remain balanced no more than if "standard" spells were taken... This of course assumes the book spells are balanced which we know is untrue. See above. Expanding the class spell list is to me "expanding the list of spells i dont know" if the spell is not added to the character's spell's known. Thats not a significant power up, IMO. We disagree and will continue to do so. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Why Does spell Reasearch Have Such a High Cost?
Top