Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Next
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
Twitch
YouTube
Facebook (EN Publishing)
Facebook (EN World)
Twitter
Instagram
TikTok
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
The
VOIDRUNNER'S CODEX
is coming! Explore new worlds, fight oppressive empires, fend off fearsome aliens, and wield deadly psionics with this comprehensive boxed set expansion for 5E and A5E!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
Why does the idea of no Free Will bother some people?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Aaron L" data-source="post: 6047724" data-attributes="member: 926"><p>(First off, finding this thread immediately after explaining on another thread what a P-Zombie is was just bizarrely coincidental!) </p><p></p><p>Janx, I think you're confusing "Free Will" with some other concept, perhaps "Personality." You bring up an interesting topic, though. I wouldn't personally be bothered by the idea of not having free will... after all, if I can't see the strings controlling me, and can't even perceive their effect on me, why give a damn? Would it even make a difference for me? And, as Umbran (who I have observed over the years to be a very bright guy) already pointed out, even if I DID object, wouldn't that objection have been predetermined anyway? If we <em>do</em> lack Free Will, but <em>don't</em> have any resultant sense of loss of control because of it, who cares?</p><p></p><p>But conscious understanding of the motivations behind all of our decisions is not a matter of free will (or lack thereof.) No, most people don't actually consciously understand the reasoning behind most of the decisions they make. That, however, does not mean that there ARE no motivations behind those decisions, nor that we lack the free will to make them. It just highlights the fact that we don't always understand our own motivations... or even <em>usually</em> understand them. We actually usually don't understand a lot of, maybe even most of, our own motivations, unless we take the time to analyze them. And if we <em>were</em> always aware of all of our own motivations, and if we <em>did</em> take the time to sift through, sort out, and logically think through all of our opinions and decisions, a lot of us would probably have very different thoughts on a lot of subjects.</p><p></p><p>And we would all live in a world full of much nicer and more reasonable people.</p><p></p><p>Actually, almost everyone DOES, at one time or another, do exactly that very thing; stop, think about a past decision, try to understand our own motivations for making that decision, and then wish we had made a different choice... it is called <em>regret</em>. And everyone has experienced it.</p><p></p><p>That is actually pretty much the core of what psychological counseling is; siting down with someone trained in how people think, and, with their help, going back through our own thoughts and feelings in order to try to better understand why we think and feel that way. It can also help us to better understand ourselves so we will take the time to think about and decisions make better ones in the future.</p><p></p><p>But about that study you mentioned; I'm fairly certain that I'm familiar with it, and the point of the study wasn't actually all that startling or important. The study was only about emotional reactions to people, first impressions sort of thing, and how they are formed quickly and tend to take a lot to change. It wasn't about total thought processes or cognition in general. The results of that study don't apply to how we think about everything in general (in other words, the study was <em>not</em> saying that every decision we make is a snap decision that isn't subject to change after introspection and consideration.) We are emotional creatures, that's a fact. But that fact doesn't imply that we don't have the free will to make decisions, or to change them later. Our emotions influence our decisions, yes, but, for most people, unless we are put into a highly emotional state, they aren't the sole (or even most important) factor in our decisions.</p><p></p><p>I've read Mr' Adams' opinions (on several matters) and his views on this subject are... a little simplistic, shall we say? (as are his views on a lot of other things, as well... ) I would advise you not to put too much stock in what he has written. His little piece on Free Will was trite, but didn't really have a lot of weight to it. </p><p></p><p>Yes, we are affected by the environment and yes, that can have an effect on how and what we think. Does that mean that we have no free will? No, not really. Does the fact that we can't talk when the language center of our brain is being disrupted mean that we have no free will? No, not really. Does the fact that our desires are limited by the physical nature of the universe mean that we don't have free will? No, not really. Does the fact that we can't flap our arms and fly, even though we might REALLY REALLY want to, mean that we don't have free will? No. </p><p></p><p>And all that that really means is just this: we are physical beings composed of matter; our thoughts are affected by the matter of which we are composed; the matter of which we are composed can be affected by the environment in which we exist; our free will does not have boundless effect on our environment; and we are not capable freely of altering the physical nature of the universe by act of free will alone. And really, hopefully none of that should be much of a shock to most people.</p><p></p><p></p><p>(Now, if someone happens to be a Psionicist and actually is capable of altering the physical nature of the universe solely by act of free will, then these things, of course, do not apply to them. And I would like to meet them to begin lessons right away! <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /> ) </p><p></p><p>I know I got a bit wordy and pedantic here, but this is what I focused on in college, psychology and philosophy, and especially the areas where they connect, like this, and I've spent a little bit of time thinking about this stuff. <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /> Plus, I've been awake for about 20 hours straight at this point due to insomnia, and my mind is getting kinda foggy... I hope this wasn't totally incoherent, and REALLY hope that I didn't offend anyone; if I did I profusely and sincerely apologize! <img src="http://www.enworld.org/forum/images/smilies/angel.png" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":angel:" title="Angel :angel:" data-shortname=":angel:" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Aaron L, post: 6047724, member: 926"] (First off, finding this thread immediately after explaining on another thread what a P-Zombie is was just bizarrely coincidental!) Janx, I think you're confusing "Free Will" with some other concept, perhaps "Personality." You bring up an interesting topic, though. I wouldn't personally be bothered by the idea of not having free will... after all, if I can't see the strings controlling me, and can't even perceive their effect on me, why give a damn? Would it even make a difference for me? And, as Umbran (who I have observed over the years to be a very bright guy) already pointed out, even if I DID object, wouldn't that objection have been predetermined anyway? If we [I]do[/I] lack Free Will, but [I]don't[/I] have any resultant sense of loss of control because of it, who cares? But conscious understanding of the motivations behind all of our decisions is not a matter of free will (or lack thereof.) No, most people don't actually consciously understand the reasoning behind most of the decisions they make. That, however, does not mean that there ARE no motivations behind those decisions, nor that we lack the free will to make them. It just highlights the fact that we don't always understand our own motivations... or even [I]usually[/I] understand them. We actually usually don't understand a lot of, maybe even most of, our own motivations, unless we take the time to analyze them. And if we [I]were[/I] always aware of all of our own motivations, and if we [I]did[/I] take the time to sift through, sort out, and logically think through all of our opinions and decisions, a lot of us would probably have very different thoughts on a lot of subjects. And we would all live in a world full of much nicer and more reasonable people. Actually, almost everyone DOES, at one time or another, do exactly that very thing; stop, think about a past decision, try to understand our own motivations for making that decision, and then wish we had made a different choice... it is called [I]regret[/I]. And everyone has experienced it. That is actually pretty much the core of what psychological counseling is; siting down with someone trained in how people think, and, with their help, going back through our own thoughts and feelings in order to try to better understand why we think and feel that way. It can also help us to better understand ourselves so we will take the time to think about and decisions make better ones in the future. But about that study you mentioned; I'm fairly certain that I'm familiar with it, and the point of the study wasn't actually all that startling or important. The study was only about emotional reactions to people, first impressions sort of thing, and how they are formed quickly and tend to take a lot to change. It wasn't about total thought processes or cognition in general. The results of that study don't apply to how we think about everything in general (in other words, the study was [I]not[/I] saying that every decision we make is a snap decision that isn't subject to change after introspection and consideration.) We are emotional creatures, that's a fact. But that fact doesn't imply that we don't have the free will to make decisions, or to change them later. Our emotions influence our decisions, yes, but, for most people, unless we are put into a highly emotional state, they aren't the sole (or even most important) factor in our decisions. I've read Mr' Adams' opinions (on several matters) and his views on this subject are... a little simplistic, shall we say? (as are his views on a lot of other things, as well... ) I would advise you not to put too much stock in what he has written. His little piece on Free Will was trite, but didn't really have a lot of weight to it. Yes, we are affected by the environment and yes, that can have an effect on how and what we think. Does that mean that we have no free will? No, not really. Does the fact that we can't talk when the language center of our brain is being disrupted mean that we have no free will? No, not really. Does the fact that our desires are limited by the physical nature of the universe mean that we don't have free will? No, not really. Does the fact that we can't flap our arms and fly, even though we might REALLY REALLY want to, mean that we don't have free will? No. And all that that really means is just this: we are physical beings composed of matter; our thoughts are affected by the matter of which we are composed; the matter of which we are composed can be affected by the environment in which we exist; our free will does not have boundless effect on our environment; and we are not capable freely of altering the physical nature of the universe by act of free will alone. And really, hopefully none of that should be much of a shock to most people. (Now, if someone happens to be a Psionicist and actually is capable of altering the physical nature of the universe solely by act of free will, then these things, of course, do not apply to them. And I would like to meet them to begin lessons right away! :) ) I know I got a bit wordy and pedantic here, but this is what I focused on in college, psychology and philosophy, and especially the areas where they connect, like this, and I've spent a little bit of time thinking about this stuff. :) Plus, I've been awake for about 20 hours straight at this point due to insomnia, and my mind is getting kinda foggy... I hope this wasn't totally incoherent, and REALLY hope that I didn't offend anyone; if I did I profusely and sincerely apologize! :angel: [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
Why does the idea of no Free Will bother some people?
Top