Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Mustrum_Ridcully" data-source="post: 4183609" data-attributes="member: 710">You're correct, it was the second day. I should have checked closer. Still, it "relied" only on Mac software (in this case, it was Safari that proved vulnerable). Yes, that might have been an additional motivation. But this isn't really a good reason, if you can also win 20,000 $? I think basically all common exploits these days require user interaction. But the problem is that this actually works often enough! Maybe it would be better to not give computer access to some people, but that's unrealistic... I don't have much to add to this. I don't like Microsoft slow update cycles either. I suppose that's due to the fact that too many people rely on M$ products, and they really have to ensure that stuff keeps working, and thus need to test longer. (Consider how many old applications are "broken" due to the new security features in Vista...) Still doesn't mean I have to like it. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink    ;)"  data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" /></blockquote>