Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Why does WotC put obviously bad or illogical elements in their adventures?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Ovinomancer" data-source="post: 7185399" data-attributes="member: 16814"><p>Largely, this is self-inflicted in my case, because I've been presenting those kinds of worlds for awhile now. I layer on meaning over multiple arcs so that when a reveal happens, it's always been there, just not obvious. I also layer in lots of different things so I can adapt and make even sudden changes appear as if the rational has always been there. This comes from building a deep world with almost every NPC or major player not having a pre-written plot, but instead having a motivation and a set of goals. That way, no matter what happens, they react in a consistent fashion. <em>Finding</em> those motivations and goals is a big part of predicting what the bad guys are doing/going to do and stopping them. But, and, again, I'm dealing with SKT only here as the first module I've run in a decade, I find that this module just has things happen to the players that are out of the blue and has them react to it. I find, more than halfway through, that the core concept and many of the set pieces are good, but that I'd completely restructure the entire thing if I were to attempt it again because it has some glaring holes (the hill giants, btw, are nettlesome, not glaring). For one, the actual bad guys don't make an appearance until most of the way through the game. Boo. There should have been some color encounter early on where the players run into them, and learn to hate them, so that the emotional payoff in a later scene isn't 'weird cultists are the bad guys? Fine, whatever, let's kill them" it's "I KNEW it was those bastards, I have a bone to pick with them!" </p><p></p><p>SKT, instead, seems to just hide information until they give it to the players to start the next bit. Except for the Shrine of the All Father Oracle, though, there the players have to have been paying some decent attention and then guess which questions will result in the information they need to continue. Blargh. Works if they do, doesn't if they don't. My players, who usually close attention, fumbled here because of the lack of sufficient foreshadowing. They kept asking questions about things that had happened in the modules that didn't go with the main plot because they assumed that since it was impactful to them, it was important. But that's how my games run, and I failed to account for the change at the one point in the module where it doesn't just hand out the next job to do and the needed information to do it.</p><p></p><p>I picked up SKT because my group had an out-of-game major change and we switched to Roll20 instead of face to face for awhile. SKT had pretty maps and all of the fixings supposedly done and we were all learning the new interface so it seemed a good bet, especially since I had a change in duties at work and had less time for prep during the transition. But it's, so far, turned out to be more work as I get deeper into the game to change it into something that isn't just a string of connected combat encounters. The maps are pretty, though.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Ovinomancer, post: 7185399, member: 16814"] Largely, this is self-inflicted in my case, because I've been presenting those kinds of worlds for awhile now. I layer on meaning over multiple arcs so that when a reveal happens, it's always been there, just not obvious. I also layer in lots of different things so I can adapt and make even sudden changes appear as if the rational has always been there. This comes from building a deep world with almost every NPC or major player not having a pre-written plot, but instead having a motivation and a set of goals. That way, no matter what happens, they react in a consistent fashion. [i]Finding[/i] those motivations and goals is a big part of predicting what the bad guys are doing/going to do and stopping them. But, and, again, I'm dealing with SKT only here as the first module I've run in a decade, I find that this module just has things happen to the players that are out of the blue and has them react to it. I find, more than halfway through, that the core concept and many of the set pieces are good, but that I'd completely restructure the entire thing if I were to attempt it again because it has some glaring holes (the hill giants, btw, are nettlesome, not glaring). For one, the actual bad guys don't make an appearance until most of the way through the game. Boo. There should have been some color encounter early on where the players run into them, and learn to hate them, so that the emotional payoff in a later scene isn't 'weird cultists are the bad guys? Fine, whatever, let's kill them" it's "I KNEW it was those bastards, I have a bone to pick with them!" SKT, instead, seems to just hide information until they give it to the players to start the next bit. Except for the Shrine of the All Father Oracle, though, there the players have to have been paying some decent attention and then guess which questions will result in the information they need to continue. Blargh. Works if they do, doesn't if they don't. My players, who usually close attention, fumbled here because of the lack of sufficient foreshadowing. They kept asking questions about things that had happened in the modules that didn't go with the main plot because they assumed that since it was impactful to them, it was important. But that's how my games run, and I failed to account for the change at the one point in the module where it doesn't just hand out the next job to do and the needed information to do it. I picked up SKT because my group had an out-of-game major change and we switched to Roll20 instead of face to face for awhile. SKT had pretty maps and all of the fixings supposedly done and we were all learning the new interface so it seemed a good bet, especially since I had a change in duties at work and had less time for prep during the transition. But it's, so far, turned out to be more work as I get deeper into the game to change it into something that isn't just a string of connected combat encounters. The maps are pretty, though. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Why does WotC put obviously bad or illogical elements in their adventures?
Top