Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Why doesn't the 5' step provoke AoO?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Thanee" data-source="post: 2755680" data-attributes="member: 478"><p>The reason for the 5-ft. step is, that combat is not and should not be static. Combat is a dynamic process with lots of movement, where opponents circle each other and try to outmaneuver their adversaries.</p><p></p><p>With the 5-ft. step, such movement is possible, since it has no serious penalties attached.</p><p></p><p>If you basically remove the 5-ft. step, then you will have the result, that characters will rarely move from the spot in a fight, things will just be very static.</p><p></p><p>If you want to remove the inherent advantages for non-meleers, which can use the 5-ft. step to get away from opponents, you could house rule it in the following way, but be aware, that this makes the life of archers and spellcasters a little more difficult, which does not necessarily have to be a bad thing, tho.</p><p></p><p><strong>House Rule:</strong></p><p></p><p>A 5-ft. step does not provoke an attack of opportunity from an opponent, if both the square the creature starts in and the square the creature moves to are within the threatened area of the opponent. If the target square is outside the threatened area, then the 5-ft. step provokes just as normal movement.</p><p></p><p>Or a slightly different approach...</p><p></p><p><strong>5-ft. step of opportunity:</strong></p><p></p><p>If a 5-ft. step brings a creature outside of the threatened area of an opponent, that opponent may immediately make a 5-ft. step outside of the normal turn, when the following requirements are met:</p><p>1) The opponent threatens the creature after moving to the new square.</p><p>2) The opponent has not otherwise moved any distance (including making a 5-ft. step) during the round (or during the last action).</p><p></p><p>Bye</p><p>Thanee</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Thanee, post: 2755680, member: 478"] The reason for the 5-ft. step is, that combat is not and should not be static. Combat is a dynamic process with lots of movement, where opponents circle each other and try to outmaneuver their adversaries. With the 5-ft. step, such movement is possible, since it has no serious penalties attached. If you basically remove the 5-ft. step, then you will have the result, that characters will rarely move from the spot in a fight, things will just be very static. If you want to remove the inherent advantages for non-meleers, which can use the 5-ft. step to get away from opponents, you could house rule it in the following way, but be aware, that this makes the life of archers and spellcasters a little more difficult, which does not necessarily have to be a bad thing, tho. [b]House Rule:[/b] A 5-ft. step does not provoke an attack of opportunity from an opponent, if both the square the creature starts in and the square the creature moves to are within the threatened area of the opponent. If the target square is outside the threatened area, then the 5-ft. step provokes just as normal movement. Or a slightly different approach... [b]5-ft. step of opportunity:[/b] If a 5-ft. step brings a creature outside of the threatened area of an opponent, that opponent may immediately make a 5-ft. step outside of the normal turn, when the following requirements are met: 1) The opponent threatens the creature after moving to the new square. 2) The opponent has not otherwise moved any distance (including making a 5-ft. step) during the round (or during the last action). Bye Thanee [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Why doesn't the 5' step provoke AoO?
Top