Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Why Don't Barbarians or Fighters Get Bonus Skills?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Kobold Stew" data-source="post: 6083605" data-attributes="member: 23484"><p>Admittedly, I am staking an extreme position. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" /></p><p></p><p>But given the system we've seen, I think it solves more problems than it creates.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>It's easy to get more skills, you just need to decide to invest in them -- to make the decision to become a skill guy. </p><p></p><p>Based on what we've seen in DDN, individual skills are less important now -- with the exception of disable device (which leads to problems I've discussed <a href="http://www.enworld.org/forum/showthread.php?333140-Disable-Device-and-Thieves-Tools" target="_blank">here</a>), everything is done through ability checks. Skills give a benefit, but it's not the case that everything needs to be "covered". Skills let you add your skill die. As long as this way of modelling skills stays, then I think too many skills just undermine the ability to be special, and to usefully contribute to the party.</p><p></p><p>Right now, there are problems with the list, IMO. One is the large number of suboptimal choices. I've suggested a modest paring of the list <a href="http://www.enworld.org/forum/showthread.php?332925-Paring-the-skill-list" target="_blank">here</a>. The discussion there shows how varied the understanding of skills is, even among smart interested readers of the packets. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>See, I'm not sure that's true. It will be for some, sure. Maybe even for the "advanced" character builders that frequent these boards. But it adds a complexity that doesn't obviously make things better. Overlap is simply too easy to get:</p><p></p><p>- Some Races give skills (Elves get Spot and Listen)</p><p>- Backgrounds give skills</p><p>- Some Classes give skills (and this is the defining benefit for rogues) *</p><p>- One can choose to take Superior Skill Training *</p><p>- Some Feats also give a skill incidentally (e.g. Hide in Shadows)</p><p>etc. (conceivably magic items could let you use a skill die to accomplish something, etc.)</p><p></p><p>So with my approach, if a character already trained in Stealth learns to Hide in Shadows, he doesn't learn a new skill. The alternative is that he or she may learn how to Use Rope, or Heraldry, or how to Drive a cart. It's better just to let it be a free choice of a skill, than go through this charade.</p><p></p><p>Perception skills are even more skewed: only Thugs and Spys and Elves are naturally perceptive, but now Elf Spys get to choose any skill they want, but others don't. That doesn't seem right.</p><p></p><p>Or Again: Clerics learn Knowledge Arcane, Religion, or Forbidden Lore. What happens when a background gives one of these (e.g. Sage or Priest)? If I have Kn (religion) already, do I get a free choice in my skill (my cleric swims!) or do I have less choice than I would if I were not a priest? Neither answer satisfies.</p><p></p><p>Examples like this are just too easy to find, and will only increase as more and more material becomes available. </p><p></p><p>In a system with ability checks not skill checks, fewer skills across the board, with a modestly pared list, is (I feel) the answer. </p><p></p><p>Don't like that answer? Fine! I'm just as happy with a "more skills" answer:</p><p></p><p>All characters get 6 (or however many) skills -- chosen freely from a list. No backgrounds, no racial skills, no class skills. Just a free choice with a fixed number. The only characters who get more are Rogues and those who invest in Superior Skill Training.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Kobold Stew, post: 6083605, member: 23484"] Admittedly, I am staking an extreme position. ;) But given the system we've seen, I think it solves more problems than it creates. It's easy to get more skills, you just need to decide to invest in them -- to make the decision to become a skill guy. Based on what we've seen in DDN, individual skills are less important now -- with the exception of disable device (which leads to problems I've discussed [URL="http://www.enworld.org/forum/showthread.php?333140-Disable-Device-and-Thieves-Tools"]here[/URL]), everything is done through ability checks. Skills give a benefit, but it's not the case that everything needs to be "covered". Skills let you add your skill die. As long as this way of modelling skills stays, then I think too many skills just undermine the ability to be special, and to usefully contribute to the party. Right now, there are problems with the list, IMO. One is the large number of suboptimal choices. I've suggested a modest paring of the list [URL="http://www.enworld.org/forum/showthread.php?332925-Paring-the-skill-list"]here[/URL]. The discussion there shows how varied the understanding of skills is, even among smart interested readers of the packets. See, I'm not sure that's true. It will be for some, sure. Maybe even for the "advanced" character builders that frequent these boards. But it adds a complexity that doesn't obviously make things better. Overlap is simply too easy to get: - Some Races give skills (Elves get Spot and Listen) - Backgrounds give skills - Some Classes give skills (and this is the defining benefit for rogues) * - One can choose to take Superior Skill Training * - Some Feats also give a skill incidentally (e.g. Hide in Shadows) etc. (conceivably magic items could let you use a skill die to accomplish something, etc.) So with my approach, if a character already trained in Stealth learns to Hide in Shadows, he doesn't learn a new skill. The alternative is that he or she may learn how to Use Rope, or Heraldry, or how to Drive a cart. It's better just to let it be a free choice of a skill, than go through this charade. Perception skills are even more skewed: only Thugs and Spys and Elves are naturally perceptive, but now Elf Spys get to choose any skill they want, but others don't. That doesn't seem right. Or Again: Clerics learn Knowledge Arcane, Religion, or Forbidden Lore. What happens when a background gives one of these (e.g. Sage or Priest)? If I have Kn (religion) already, do I get a free choice in my skill (my cleric swims!) or do I have less choice than I would if I were not a priest? Neither answer satisfies. Examples like this are just too easy to find, and will only increase as more and more material becomes available. In a system with ability checks not skill checks, fewer skills across the board, with a modestly pared list, is (I feel) the answer. Don't like that answer? Fine! I'm just as happy with a "more skills" answer: All characters get 6 (or however many) skills -- chosen freely from a list. No backgrounds, no racial skills, no class skills. Just a free choice with a fixed number. The only characters who get more are Rogues and those who invest in Superior Skill Training. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Why Don't Barbarians or Fighters Get Bonus Skills?
Top