Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Why Don't Barbarians or Fighters Get Bonus Skills?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Rune" data-source="post: 6083880" data-attributes="member: 67"><p>This! In my experience, the more skills a character has, the fewer things a player will try that aren't on his/her character's list. Since that is not a play-style I want to emphasize I have used (and am currently using in a modified game of basic) a different set of skills:</p><p></p><p>Each character has three skills.</p><p></p><p>The first is a background skill, called whatever the background is called. It provides a bonus to any ability check that a person with said background should reasonably get a bonus to. This skill, like the background, itself, is easily made up by the player at character generation and is intended to be a <em>very</em> quick way to help the player differentiate the character from others of the same class.</p><p></p><p>The second skill is the class skill. A character is assumed to be skilled at being whatever class they are, so they get a bonus to ability checks that are related to that class, as well. This is the main utility-skill of the character, most likely to see use on a somewhat regular basis.</p><p></p><p>The third skill is a specialty. At character generation, I ask the players what one thing their characters are better at than anyone else they know. This one produces some interesting results, depending on what mindset the player is at when creating the character (for instance, a player once had his character specialize in "Luck"). As with the other two skills, all ability checks made that ought to be enhanced by the specialty get a bonus. This skill is intended to help the player distinguish the character as an individual (again, very quickly).</p><p></p><p>That's it. It's easy (especially for neophytes), encourages situational problem-solving, does <em>not</em> encourage players to spend the whole session with their eyes on their character sheets, and helps speed up character generation.</p><p></p><p>'Course, this is all easy enough to house-rule over whatever skill system they come up with. So, even though I voted "No," my actual vote is "I don't care."</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Rune, post: 6083880, member: 67"] This! In my experience, the more skills a character has, the fewer things a player will try that aren't on his/her character's list. Since that is not a play-style I want to emphasize I have used (and am currently using in a modified game of basic) a different set of skills: Each character has three skills. The first is a background skill, called whatever the background is called. It provides a bonus to any ability check that a person with said background should reasonably get a bonus to. This skill, like the background, itself, is easily made up by the player at character generation and is intended to be a [i]very[/i] quick way to help the player differentiate the character from others of the same class. The second skill is the class skill. A character is assumed to be skilled at being whatever class they are, so they get a bonus to ability checks that are related to that class, as well. This is the main utility-skill of the character, most likely to see use on a somewhat regular basis. The third skill is a specialty. At character generation, I ask the players what one thing their characters are better at than anyone else they know. This one produces some interesting results, depending on what mindset the player is at when creating the character (for instance, a player once had his character specialize in "Luck"). As with the other two skills, all ability checks made that ought to be enhanced by the specialty get a bonus. This skill is intended to help the player distinguish the character as an individual (again, very quickly). That's it. It's easy (especially for neophytes), encourages situational problem-solving, does [i]not[/i] encourage players to spend the whole session with their eyes on their character sheets, and helps speed up character generation. 'Course, this is all easy enough to house-rule over whatever skill system they come up with. So, even though I voted "No," my actual vote is "I don't care." [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Why Don't Barbarians or Fighters Get Bonus Skills?
Top