Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Why Don't Barbarians or Fighters Get Bonus Skills?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Sekhmet" data-source="post: 6084250" data-attributes="member: 97602"><p>[MENTION=93444]shidaku[/MENTION] My argument is that, within D&D, there has never been a mention of Barbarians being trained soldiers, and that Fighters are traditionally such a wide variety of kinds of people, that forcing them into the soldier role (one of the many that are open to them) is inappropriate. I'm all for giving these people skills for different backgrounds, but tacking them on to the base class is sloppy and inappropriate.</p><p></p><p> The Barbarian from the North, for example, might have Survival (very difficult place to live), Climb (avalanches and rockfalls can alter terrain dramatically), or Jump (leaping from rock to rock is a constant consideration in mountain climbing). He probably has Use Rope. He wouldn't have Swim (water is deadly in these environments, you steer clear), and he definitely wouldn't have Search (extra time spent in the wilderness means extra possibilities of snowstorms, frigid wind, or encounters), though you could argue for Spot.</p><p> The Barbarian from the Jungle wouldn't have Jump (there really isn't a need to jump in a Jungle), but he'd have Climb (ambushing from trees). While he'd still may pick up Survival (though far less necessary in the jungle than in the North), he's far more likely to be able to Swim. </p><p> The Barbarian from the Plains might have picked up Ride instead of Jump and Climb. No real need for jumping or climbing, and Spot isn't really an issue anymore, either. Survival is slightly more important than in the Jungle, but still not a primary concern. </p><p></p><p> The Fighter who was a Soldier would have no need for Survival - his food, trail, and safety is secured by other members of the military with those specific jobs. He can probably run, for a long time, and then kill things when he gets there. He doesn't jump, climb, swim, or use ropes. He doesn't have Knowledge - Anything, and he was likely never taught to ride animals.</p><p> The Fighter who was a Nobleman, who became a proud Knight, will have Diplomacy, Knowledge (Military Tactics or History), Ride, and Spot, without a doubt. He picked up spotting while on long hunts with his father and betters, was drilled in history and tactics from the time he was a child, and riding has become second nature to him. He has no business jumping, climbing, or living in the wilderness. </p><p> The Fighter who was an Enforcer for some criminal organisation picked up an entirely different set of skills - Spot, Search, Intimidate, and Handle Animal could be called for. </p><p></p><p> All trained Fighters - pick up sword, swing at things, but with a variety of different skills based on the environment their background puts them in. </p><p></p><p> ALL Wizards MUST learn Knowledge skills during training as a Wizard.</p><p> ALL Monks MUST learn athleticism skills during training as a Monk.</p><p> ALL Rogues MUST learn thievery during training as a Rogue.</p><p> NOT ALL Fighters or Barbarians MUST learn skills outside of hitting things and taking hits. </p><p> </p><p> This is the reason they do not get bonus skills.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Sekhmet, post: 6084250, member: 97602"] [MENTION=93444]shidaku[/MENTION] My argument is that, within D&D, there has never been a mention of Barbarians being trained soldiers, and that Fighters are traditionally such a wide variety of kinds of people, that forcing them into the soldier role (one of the many that are open to them) is inappropriate. I'm all for giving these people skills for different backgrounds, but tacking them on to the base class is sloppy and inappropriate. The Barbarian from the North, for example, might have Survival (very difficult place to live), Climb (avalanches and rockfalls can alter terrain dramatically), or Jump (leaping from rock to rock is a constant consideration in mountain climbing). He probably has Use Rope. He wouldn't have Swim (water is deadly in these environments, you steer clear), and he definitely wouldn't have Search (extra time spent in the wilderness means extra possibilities of snowstorms, frigid wind, or encounters), though you could argue for Spot. The Barbarian from the Jungle wouldn't have Jump (there really isn't a need to jump in a Jungle), but he'd have Climb (ambushing from trees). While he'd still may pick up Survival (though far less necessary in the jungle than in the North), he's far more likely to be able to Swim. The Barbarian from the Plains might have picked up Ride instead of Jump and Climb. No real need for jumping or climbing, and Spot isn't really an issue anymore, either. Survival is slightly more important than in the Jungle, but still not a primary concern. The Fighter who was a Soldier would have no need for Survival - his food, trail, and safety is secured by other members of the military with those specific jobs. He can probably run, for a long time, and then kill things when he gets there. He doesn't jump, climb, swim, or use ropes. He doesn't have Knowledge - Anything, and he was likely never taught to ride animals. The Fighter who was a Nobleman, who became a proud Knight, will have Diplomacy, Knowledge (Military Tactics or History), Ride, and Spot, without a doubt. He picked up spotting while on long hunts with his father and betters, was drilled in history and tactics from the time he was a child, and riding has become second nature to him. He has no business jumping, climbing, or living in the wilderness. The Fighter who was an Enforcer for some criminal organisation picked up an entirely different set of skills - Spot, Search, Intimidate, and Handle Animal could be called for. All trained Fighters - pick up sword, swing at things, but with a variety of different skills based on the environment their background puts them in. ALL Wizards MUST learn Knowledge skills during training as a Wizard. ALL Monks MUST learn athleticism skills during training as a Monk. ALL Rogues MUST learn thievery during training as a Rogue. NOT ALL Fighters or Barbarians MUST learn skills outside of hitting things and taking hits. This is the reason they do not get bonus skills. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Why Don't Barbarians or Fighters Get Bonus Skills?
Top