Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Why DON'T people like guns in D&D?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Dausuul" data-source="post: 5078477" data-attributes="member: 58197"><p>Call it what you like. The lancers would not have won without the archers. If archers are "mere" harassment, so is a modern air force, but good luck fighting a war without one.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Originally, firearms were fielded the same way bows were, with ranks of pikemen to protect the gunners. Later, someone came up with a clever idea; unlike a bow, a gun is a long iron tube solid enough to serve as a melee weapon, so why not put something pointy on the end of it and dispense with the pikemen?</p><p></p><p>Hence the invention of the bayonet. Guns no longer needed melee support because they were melee weapons themselves. You can be damn sure that without that, pikemen would have stuck around--when your ranged weapon takes upwards of 15 seconds to reload and has a maximum effective range of about 100 yards, you do <em>not</em> want to rely on it exclusively. Bayonets may seem like a curiosity nowadays, but back then they were an essential part of a soldier's gear. (Although even now, bayonets see use once in a while. In 2004, a Scottish unit deployed to Iraq was ambushed by insurgents; running low on ammo, they fixed bayonets and charged to great effect.)</p><p></p><p>But specialized melee troops were still employed, specifically sabre-wielding cavalry. You know what they did? They charged in and slaughtered the disorganized foe after massed gunfire broke up the enemy formation. Sound familiar? It should, because it's exactly what cavalry working with archers did, centuries before. Mongol horse archers took on much larger armies that way; your own "Lance to Pistol" link describes tactics that could have come straight out of General Subutai's handbook, if he'd had a handbook.</p><p></p><p>No one here is disputing that guns eventually became superior to bows. If they hadn't, we'd still be shooting arrows today. But early pistoliers and arquebusiers were deployed in exactly the same manner as archers, to perform exactly the same function--and not because the generals didn't know what they were doing, either.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Dausuul, post: 5078477, member: 58197"] Call it what you like. The lancers would not have won without the archers. If archers are "mere" harassment, so is a modern air force, but good luck fighting a war without one. Originally, firearms were fielded the same way bows were, with ranks of pikemen to protect the gunners. Later, someone came up with a clever idea; unlike a bow, a gun is a long iron tube solid enough to serve as a melee weapon, so why not put something pointy on the end of it and dispense with the pikemen? Hence the invention of the bayonet. Guns no longer needed melee support because they were melee weapons themselves. You can be damn sure that without that, pikemen would have stuck around--when your ranged weapon takes upwards of 15 seconds to reload and has a maximum effective range of about 100 yards, you do [I]not[/I] want to rely on it exclusively. Bayonets may seem like a curiosity nowadays, but back then they were an essential part of a soldier's gear. (Although even now, bayonets see use once in a while. In 2004, a Scottish unit deployed to Iraq was ambushed by insurgents; running low on ammo, they fixed bayonets and charged to great effect.) But specialized melee troops were still employed, specifically sabre-wielding cavalry. You know what they did? They charged in and slaughtered the disorganized foe after massed gunfire broke up the enemy formation. Sound familiar? It should, because it's exactly what cavalry working with archers did, centuries before. Mongol horse archers took on much larger armies that way; your own "Lance to Pistol" link describes tactics that could have come straight out of General Subutai's handbook, if he'd had a handbook. No one here is disputing that guns eventually became superior to bows. If they hadn't, we'd still be shooting arrows today. But early pistoliers and arquebusiers were deployed in exactly the same manner as archers, to perform exactly the same function--and not because the generals didn't know what they were doing, either. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Why DON'T people like guns in D&D?
Top