Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Chaosmancer" data-source="post: 8053937" data-attributes="member: 6801228">Also [USER=2525]@Mistwell[/USER] , I brought up this point in the thread on monks on this site, because it was relevant to the discussion. Along with a few other points, such as him counting spells with multi-round durations when calculating his baseline damage for a class (specifically he called out Spirit Guardians as something he considers) which, unless we watched all his videos, we likely did not know, and was good to include in a discussion about his analysis. The only reason I never did link that thread from GiTP was because I vaguely remembered that linking other forums is generally frowned upon. Also, talking to Treantmonk on that thread would be hard at this point, as shortly after those posts, he said he was leaving the thread, stating the agree to disagree because it is all opinions style of discussion. No judgement on my end, just reporting.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Chaosmancer, post: 8053937, member: 6801228"] Also [USER=2525]@Mistwell[/USER] , I brought up this point in the thread on monks on this site, because it was relevant to the discussion. Along with a few other points, such as him counting spells with multi-round durations when calculating his baseline damage for a class (specifically he called out Spirit Guardians as something he considers) which, unless we watched all his videos, we likely did not know, and was good to include in a discussion about his analysis. The only reason I never did link that thread from GiTP was because I vaguely remembered that linking other forums is generally frowned upon. Also, talking to Treantmonk on that thread would be hard at this point, as shortly after those posts, he said he was leaving the thread, stating the agree to disagree because it is all opinions style of discussion. No judgement on my end, just reporting. [/QUOTE]

Verification