Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Stormonu" data-source="post: 9781717" data-attributes="member: 52734">While those 2E campaign worlds may have "failed" because TSR went too far into the weeds with product, to me the basic idea was sound - show the flexibility of the system and give examples of some of the wild and non-standard worlds you put in front of the players.  That creativity feels missing in WotC's current "thrive on nostalgia" binge they've been doing.Look at Daggerheart - the core rulebook has a couple pages on a half-dozen distinctive campaign seeds.  I'd like to see more of that; maybe even a book that's a compilation of five to ten page treatment of NEW campaign worlds (and map) for the DM & players to further develop.  Throw in quarter-page outlines for adventures for that world (so you get at least four adventure outlines on a page), like you find in the Greyhawk set and let the DM flesh them out rather than burn a whole chapter or half a book on something a fraction might use.  If people latch on to one of those new worlds as favorite, WotC could develop it further.   They sort of did that with Radiant Citadel, I think they could do more worlds and genres, rather than stuffing everything they can into FR.If WotC's research shows that people use their own homebrew worlds more than published ones, I think giving their customers the seeds to then flesh out their own world makes far greater sense than retread "the classics" that everyone is going to complain they're doing wrong.</blockquote>

Verification