Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="feartheminotaur" data-source="post: 6827744" data-attributes="member: 6801354">Then here's a crazy idea: Ask it that way. Your thread title and initial responses were not about min/maxing, they asked about a player's personal rationale for playing a class.&nbsp; Then you ignored/dismissed subjective replies as objectively wrong, because...the &quot;EK gets more attacks&quot; or whatever.&nbsp; You were not seeking advice, or asking a question, you were looking for an argument, and when called on it, shifted the goalposts to &quot;I was just asking about min/maxing&quot;.&nbsp; Instead of posting &quot;My opinion is this.&nbsp; It is the only correct opinion.&nbsp; Prove me wrong&quot;, please ask a question or seek opinions: &quot;How do I min/max a cleric to be on par with X?&quot;, &quot;What have people seen at their tables?&quot;, etc. So, I think you know exactly why everyone is acting &quot;salty&quot;, despite your disingenuous claim otherwise.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="feartheminotaur, post: 6827744, member: 6801354"] Then here's a crazy idea: Ask it that way. Your thread title and initial responses were not about min/maxing, they asked about a player's [I]personal[/I] rationale for playing a class. Then you ignored/dismissed subjective replies as objectively wrong, because...the "EK gets more attacks" or whatever. You were not seeking advice, or asking a question, you were looking for an argument, and when called on it, shifted the goalposts to "I was just asking about min/maxing". Instead of posting "My opinion is this. It is the only correct opinion. Prove me wrong", please ask a question or seek opinions: "How do I min/max a cleric to be on par with X?", "What have people seen at their tables?", etc. So, I think you know exactly why everyone is acting "salty", despite your disingenuous claim otherwise. [/QUOTE]

Verification