Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Why EXP penalty for Multiclassing anyway?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Celebrim" data-source="post: 5561270" data-attributes="member: 4937"><p>This is true, but you have to make some additional qualifiers here. It's not merely following a code, or some guidelines, or having some strict adherence to what you believe is ethical. Chaotic people can have a code, hold themselves to a set of guidelines, and adhere strictly to some standard of behavior. What ultimately distinguishes Lawful from Chaotic is the question of who is ultimately responsible for the code. To qualify as Lawful, you have to be adhering to some externally reviewable code which is imposed by some outside force, and it must be the case that when you are in doubt how to behave you trust the code rather than your own consciousness and wisdom. </p><p></p><p>The most essential difference between Law and Chaos is over the question of in who rests the authority for establishing what is morally right - the collective or the individual. The Chaotic would advise that if in the estimation of your consciousness, the code was wrong, for you to follow the dictates of your own consciousness and do what you think is right. The Chaotic would also advise that you are ultimately responcible for deciding what the moral code of behavior should be, and hense it follows that even when a Chaotic has a strict code of behavior it is unreviewable because it exists only within the Chaotic and derives its authority from the individual. Other individuals can judge the Chaotic on the basis of thier own internal code, but they can never judge another person on the basis of his own unknowable code.</p><p></p><p>The Lawful rejects this and says that a moral code is useless if it applies only to an individual and may be overriden by the individuals feelings on the matter. The Lawful says that moral authority rests in some external source - a law giver, a diety, a body of ideas, the social collective - and is codified in to a reviewable body of laws whereby each individual can judge every other individual by the same standard. The Lawful differs from the Chaotic in being able to say, "This is the code I follow, it's an absolute standard, and you can know it, and know when I have departed from it and judge me by that." The Chaotic may be able to say, "I have a code I follow.", but will say, "And you will know it by how I behave, because it is a relative standard and though it applies to me it may not apply to everyone."</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Celebrim, post: 5561270, member: 4937"] This is true, but you have to make some additional qualifiers here. It's not merely following a code, or some guidelines, or having some strict adherence to what you believe is ethical. Chaotic people can have a code, hold themselves to a set of guidelines, and adhere strictly to some standard of behavior. What ultimately distinguishes Lawful from Chaotic is the question of who is ultimately responsible for the code. To qualify as Lawful, you have to be adhering to some externally reviewable code which is imposed by some outside force, and it must be the case that when you are in doubt how to behave you trust the code rather than your own consciousness and wisdom. The most essential difference between Law and Chaos is over the question of in who rests the authority for establishing what is morally right - the collective or the individual. The Chaotic would advise that if in the estimation of your consciousness, the code was wrong, for you to follow the dictates of your own consciousness and do what you think is right. The Chaotic would also advise that you are ultimately responcible for deciding what the moral code of behavior should be, and hense it follows that even when a Chaotic has a strict code of behavior it is unreviewable because it exists only within the Chaotic and derives its authority from the individual. Other individuals can judge the Chaotic on the basis of thier own internal code, but they can never judge another person on the basis of his own unknowable code. The Lawful rejects this and says that a moral code is useless if it applies only to an individual and may be overriden by the individuals feelings on the matter. The Lawful says that moral authority rests in some external source - a law giver, a diety, a body of ideas, the social collective - and is codified in to a reviewable body of laws whereby each individual can judge every other individual by the same standard. The Lawful differs from the Chaotic in being able to say, "This is the code I follow, it's an absolute standard, and you can know it, and know when I have departed from it and judge me by that." The Chaotic may be able to say, "I have a code I follow.", but will say, "And you will know it by how I behave, because it is a relative standard and though it applies to me it may not apply to everyone." [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Why EXP penalty for Multiclassing anyway?
Top