Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Lanefan" data-source="post: 8375348" data-attributes="member: 29398">Lightning bolt trap here: "Hold my beer". <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile    :)"  data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" />Now that's a leap of faith.  Valid house rule for a table, perhaps, but canonical?  Open to debate, at the very least.Assuming, of course, the following:--- the passage is the only way forward (i.e. there's no other known way to reach the party's goal)--- the passage is not itself a red herring--- there's no hidden bypass that the party have thus far either failed to find or (more commonly IME) not even looked for--- the PCs don't have means of getting past the blockage e.g. passwall, dimension door, or a few hours work from a Dwarf.'Cause yes, any DM worth her salt would do this now and then.Here I agree: if the Servant does set if off that's good use of resources.  My argument is that I think some are being far too generous in what they allow the Servant to do.</blockquote>