Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Why grognards still matter
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Chaosmancer" data-source="post: 9602179" data-attributes="member: 6801228"><p>No. You are completely and utterly missing my point. It is not that they would take issue with those things. It is that they would not have ADVOCATED for those things. Those things would not have been their ideas. You are taking a position that says "these are not the sort of ideas those people would clamor to see <em>before they were created</em>" and twisting it into "So you are saying they would hate those ideas?!" No. No. And again, NO.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>That 5%? They are the ones calling themselves Hardcore fans. And give it whatever percentage you want, but you cannot deny their existence when they are the ones we are largely talking about. Someone who just likes something a lot would not self-identify as a "Hardcore fan". There may be a thin line between a Super Fan and a Hardcore Fan, but for those who self-identify as hardcore? They may <em>SAY</em> that they have innovative ideas, but they rarely do. Often they want the changes to make something closer to the original, idealized version. They may <em>SAY</em> they are fine with change, but they are the strongest voice pushing back against change when it is proposed. They are the ones claiming something is bad <em>BECAUSE </em>it was a change, without really examining if it was bad in and of itself. </p><p></p><p>And again, before you strawman me, this is not ab absolute. People are not a monolith. But people do follow patterns.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Because I have never seen a self-identified DnD Grognard state that they want WoTC to bring Glorantha into the fold. Or to bring back the Nentir Vale. Do you think I pulled the examples of Mystara, Birthright and Darksun out of the Aether? Those are real things, really proposed, by real people, on this forum. Does that mean they spit upon other settings before grinding them into the mud with disdain? No. I never said that, that you projecting your biases onto me. However, none of the self-identified Grognards proposed DnD should make a new setting featuring cutesy animal people in a forest. None of them proposed a Miyazaki inspired setting. Once exposed to them, they may like the ideas, but they did not <em>COME UP</em> with the ideas.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Chaosmancer, post: 9602179, member: 6801228"] No. You are completely and utterly missing my point. It is not that they would take issue with those things. It is that they would not have ADVOCATED for those things. Those things would not have been their ideas. You are taking a position that says "these are not the sort of ideas those people would clamor to see [I]before they were created[/I]" and twisting it into "So you are saying they would hate those ideas?!" No. No. And again, NO. That 5%? They are the ones calling themselves Hardcore fans. And give it whatever percentage you want, but you cannot deny their existence when they are the ones we are largely talking about. Someone who just likes something a lot would not self-identify as a "Hardcore fan". There may be a thin line between a Super Fan and a Hardcore Fan, but for those who self-identify as hardcore? They may [I]SAY[/I] that they have innovative ideas, but they rarely do. Often they want the changes to make something closer to the original, idealized version. They may [I]SAY[/I] they are fine with change, but they are the strongest voice pushing back against change when it is proposed. They are the ones claiming something is bad [I]BECAUSE [/I]it was a change, without really examining if it was bad in and of itself. And again, before you strawman me, this is not ab absolute. People are not a monolith. But people do follow patterns. Because I have never seen a self-identified DnD Grognard state that they want WoTC to bring Glorantha into the fold. Or to bring back the Nentir Vale. Do you think I pulled the examples of Mystara, Birthright and Darksun out of the Aether? Those are real things, really proposed, by real people, on this forum. Does that mean they spit upon other settings before grinding them into the mud with disdain? No. I never said that, that you projecting your biases onto me. However, none of the self-identified Grognards proposed DnD should make a new setting featuring cutesy animal people in a forest. None of them proposed a Miyazaki inspired setting. Once exposed to them, they may like the ideas, but they did not [I]COME UP[/I] with the ideas. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Why grognards still matter
Top