Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Sacrosanct" data-source="post: 7132587" data-attributes="member: 15700">So you're preferring 4d6 because you're ignoring the lower rolls and only taking the higher ones over an array?&nbsp; Big shocker there.&nbsp; I say ignoring, because almost all of your examples are dependent on statistically higher than normal rolls.&nbsp; So you're either ignoring low rolls, or cheating, because there's no way statistically you would have the majority of your PCs having stats be higher than array or point buy.&nbsp; Statistically, you'd have just as many PCs with lower stats as you do with higher stats, and yet your examples are almost always higher.&nbsp; So either you have a lot of moon druids in your group, or someone is fibbing the dice rolls.*Note, this isn't meant to pick on you as a new thing, per se, because after 35 years of gaming, it's always interesting to see how everyone always has higher stats for their PCs than what the math would suggest.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Sacrosanct, post: 7132587, member: 15700"] So you're preferring 4d6 because you're ignoring the lower rolls and only taking the higher ones over an array? Big shocker there. I say ignoring, because almost all of your examples are dependent on statistically higher than normal rolls. So you're either ignoring low rolls, or cheating, because there's no way statistically you would have the majority of your PCs having stats be higher than array or point buy. Statistically, you'd have just as many PCs with lower stats as you do with higher stats, and yet your examples are almost always higher. So either you have a lot of moon druids in your group, or someone is fibbing the dice rolls. *Note, this isn't meant to pick on you as a new thing, per se, because after 35 years of gaming, it's always interesting to see how [i]everyone[/i] always has higher stats for their PCs than what the math would suggest. [/QUOTE]

Verification