Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Why I dislike Sigil and the Lady of Pain
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Tymophil" data-source="post: 5609543" data-attributes="member: 46923"><p>That's why I added "so-called". In France, where I live, people are taught that philosophy began with Socrates, no matter what. All that was before was meant to lead to Socrates (as Plato portrays it, of course), so even some philosophers that where no pre-socratic are dubbed pre-socratic : archaic compared to the Plato's Socrates.</p><p>This was implemented in French education around the XIXth century, to rewrite the history of philosophy to make sure that most materialists would be seen as subpar philosophers. It was easily done as most materialist philosophers (Democritus, Epicurus, etc.) were almost wiped out of the history of philosophy (very, very few original writings remained). The fact that France was a massely christian country and that the country undertook a massive counter-revolution played a huge part...</p><p></p><p>You forget that, in the PlaneScape setting what you believe shapes reality. If the people of a certain place change their beliefs, the place will change its location in the Multiverse.</p><p></p><p>Anyway, what you conceive as true may or may not have any relation to what is or is not. Even when the evidence is given, many people stick to their beliefs however irrational they are. Palto's idealism is still seen as concievable, even though it is in plain contradiction with what little we know about the Universe. Still it is taught/believed in most advanced countries at one point or another as a great idea to look at the world.</p><p></p><p>I was not clear there. You don't <strong>choose</strong> most illusions you actually use to portray reality. Almost nobody does. Even the most materialist amongst us have a hard time disbelieving that there is something "more" about the reality that could be called a "soul".</p><p></p><p>I guess most people believe that there IS a sky. Even though there is only an illusion created by the interaction of light and the atmosphere. You don't wake up everyday, believing or disbelieving that there is a sky. Yet it comes as a shock when you are taught that there is no sky, and some people don't even believe it when they are given some evidences.</p><p></p><p>Many people believe that the ARE laws of Nature. This is a largely widespead illusion amongst our societies. How many time do you people saying that objets fall BECAUSE of the law of gravitation. It IS an illusion many people live by, and none of them chose it.</p><p></p><p>If you live by believing that there is an ideal/divine world and a corrupted one. You live in an illusionary world. Did you chose to believe this ? A platonic view of life is clearly an illusion for us nowadays. It was not in his days. Plato did know/believed that the spheres did exist and were perfect, one could argue that he never chose to believe it.</p><p></p><p>In our world, many people guide(d) their lifes on beliefs that litterally shape(d) their reality. Just look at food : the pythagorians simply never ate beans because... it would be... embarrassing, and not as pythagorean as they wished to be in some situations. Others chose to feed on uncooked, raw food because it paralleled their beliefs. The world around them is shaped by the crop they grow, the livestock they choose to cattle, etc. The world, the reality they live by, is shaped by their conscious beliefs and their unchallenged/unconscious beliefs (illusions they don't, and never, disbelieve) shape their world too. In the end, it is difficult toi see what is real, illusionary, self-delusion, etc.</p><p></p><p>We don't know much about some philosophies, but it seems from the scarse texts that survived that Cyrenaics and Epicurians did live by their doctrines on an everyday basis. They chose their food, cloths, etc. according to their philosophy.</p><p></p><p>In PlaneScape you can shake all these kind of beliefs/illusions because they can be challenged. They can be challenged because they can be true or false /dispelled depending or your faction. When you chose the faction for your player character, you don't simply say that the PC chose to believe this or that. He simply believes this or that.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Tymophil, post: 5609543, member: 46923"] That's why I added "so-called". In France, where I live, people are taught that philosophy began with Socrates, no matter what. All that was before was meant to lead to Socrates (as Plato portrays it, of course), so even some philosophers that where no pre-socratic are dubbed pre-socratic : archaic compared to the Plato's Socrates. This was implemented in French education around the XIXth century, to rewrite the history of philosophy to make sure that most materialists would be seen as subpar philosophers. It was easily done as most materialist philosophers (Democritus, Epicurus, etc.) were almost wiped out of the history of philosophy (very, very few original writings remained). The fact that France was a massely christian country and that the country undertook a massive counter-revolution played a huge part... You forget that, in the PlaneScape setting what you believe shapes reality. If the people of a certain place change their beliefs, the place will change its location in the Multiverse. Anyway, what you conceive as true may or may not have any relation to what is or is not. Even when the evidence is given, many people stick to their beliefs however irrational they are. Palto's idealism is still seen as concievable, even though it is in plain contradiction with what little we know about the Universe. Still it is taught/believed in most advanced countries at one point or another as a great idea to look at the world. I was not clear there. You don't [B]choose[/B] most illusions you actually use to portray reality. Almost nobody does. Even the most materialist amongst us have a hard time disbelieving that there is something "more" about the reality that could be called a "soul". I guess most people believe that there IS a sky. Even though there is only an illusion created by the interaction of light and the atmosphere. You don't wake up everyday, believing or disbelieving that there is a sky. Yet it comes as a shock when you are taught that there is no sky, and some people don't even believe it when they are given some evidences. Many people believe that the ARE laws of Nature. This is a largely widespead illusion amongst our societies. How many time do you people saying that objets fall BECAUSE of the law of gravitation. It IS an illusion many people live by, and none of them chose it. If you live by believing that there is an ideal/divine world and a corrupted one. You live in an illusionary world. Did you chose to believe this ? A platonic view of life is clearly an illusion for us nowadays. It was not in his days. Plato did know/believed that the spheres did exist and were perfect, one could argue that he never chose to believe it. In our world, many people guide(d) their lifes on beliefs that litterally shape(d) their reality. Just look at food : the pythagorians simply never ate beans because... it would be... embarrassing, and not as pythagorean as they wished to be in some situations. Others chose to feed on uncooked, raw food because it paralleled their beliefs. The world around them is shaped by the crop they grow, the livestock they choose to cattle, etc. The world, the reality they live by, is shaped by their conscious beliefs and their unchallenged/unconscious beliefs (illusions they don't, and never, disbelieve) shape their world too. In the end, it is difficult toi see what is real, illusionary, self-delusion, etc. We don't know much about some philosophies, but it seems from the scarse texts that survived that Cyrenaics and Epicurians did live by their doctrines on an everyday basis. They chose their food, cloths, etc. according to their philosophy. In PlaneScape you can shake all these kind of beliefs/illusions because they can be challenged. They can be challenged because they can be true or false /dispelled depending or your faction. When you chose the faction for your player character, you don't simply say that the PC chose to believe this or that. He simply believes this or that. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Why I dislike Sigil and the Lady of Pain
Top