Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Why I don't GM by the nose
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Krensky" data-source="post: 5389652" data-attributes="member: 30936"><p>Except that it's a power relationship. No matter how much people argue otherwise and no matter how true the the GM has all the power at the table. Right up until the minute the players leave the table, that is. Since the GM has the power, it's his problem and responsibility to take the lead in fixing these issues. Maybe it's a communication thing, maybe the GM needs to adjust his play style. Everyone has a responsibility to make sure that fun is had by all at the table, but as first among equals the GM has the greatest part of that since he controls the horizontal and the vertical.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Enough is implicitly defined in my comment. Enough hooks is enough for the players to find one that grabs them. Your argument that it's undefined is just trying to confuse the issue by playing semantic games with a phrase that is perfectly clear in context.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>And I reject any gaming philosophy that dismisses the GM's responsibility to run their game and instead blames the players for every problem at the table, every mistake or misstep of the GM, or every weakness of the GM's preferred play style. One of the primary weaknesses of the 'pure' sandbox style is that it requires the players be completely self directing and self motivating. If they aren't the ball is in the GM's court. Either he needs to adjust his style or talk to the players about why they aren't. It's his (shared) responsibility to make sure everyone has fun. If some of the players aren't, it's his primary responsibility to address that issue. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Nothing I said runs counter to that.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>You're right, it is. Especially since it's not true. I played in one for about a year until it folded due to the GM developing a case of parenthood, and I've played in another for the past... decade? I've lost count. I don't choose to run them because they do not scratch my GMing itch. You know what? I share players and with both those sandbox games without an issue.</p><p></p><p>What I dislike is the assertion that oh so scrupulously avoids calling the sandbox the one true way constantly beats the drum that they are a better, if not the best way to play.</p><p></p><p>Someone has an issue with a game with a narrative structure, "Run a sandbox and you won't have those problems." Someone asks for advice on running a mystery story arc, "You wouldn't have these problems if you ran a sand box." Someone has problems with their players not enjoying or playing in a sandbox, "Your players are are broken sheeple who you need to reeducate so then can appreciate the glorious sandbox that you are running."</p><p></p><p>The OP's players may be meat popsicles. He's tired everything with the possible exception of sitting down and talking with them about it. I say possible, because he didn't comment on that (or I missed it). They also may be bored and apathetic because they want more out of a GM then a keyed map, a monster manual, and a random encounter table. I don't know. If he hasn't talked with them about it, he's failing as a GM.</p><p></p><p>Sandboxes, despite peoples claims, are among the hardest medium for a GM to work in. They require the most preparation, the most player buy in, etc. That difficulty does not equate to superiority though. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>No. While the GM can do that, and the player's only real defense is to walk away, they shouldn't. By it's very nature, the player side of the screen can only effect change or take action if the GM allows it. The GM <u>should</u> allow it pretty much as a matter of course, but it still only happens because the GM allows it. As I said above, the hand the rules least rules best and the GM is best served by viewing himself as first among equals rather then absolute tyrant.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Krensky, post: 5389652, member: 30936"] Except that it's a power relationship. No matter how much people argue otherwise and no matter how true the the GM has all the power at the table. Right up until the minute the players leave the table, that is. Since the GM has the power, it's his problem and responsibility to take the lead in fixing these issues. Maybe it's a communication thing, maybe the GM needs to adjust his play style. Everyone has a responsibility to make sure that fun is had by all at the table, but as first among equals the GM has the greatest part of that since he controls the horizontal and the vertical. Enough is implicitly defined in my comment. Enough hooks is enough for the players to find one that grabs them. Your argument that it's undefined is just trying to confuse the issue by playing semantic games with a phrase that is perfectly clear in context. And I reject any gaming philosophy that dismisses the GM's responsibility to run their game and instead blames the players for every problem at the table, every mistake or misstep of the GM, or every weakness of the GM's preferred play style. One of the primary weaknesses of the 'pure' sandbox style is that it requires the players be completely self directing and self motivating. If they aren't the ball is in the GM's court. Either he needs to adjust his style or talk to the players about why they aren't. It's his (shared) responsibility to make sure everyone has fun. If some of the players aren't, it's his primary responsibility to address that issue. Nothing I said runs counter to that. You're right, it is. Especially since it's not true. I played in one for about a year until it folded due to the GM developing a case of parenthood, and I've played in another for the past... decade? I've lost count. I don't choose to run them because they do not scratch my GMing itch. You know what? I share players and with both those sandbox games without an issue. What I dislike is the assertion that oh so scrupulously avoids calling the sandbox the one true way constantly beats the drum that they are a better, if not the best way to play. Someone has an issue with a game with a narrative structure, "Run a sandbox and you won't have those problems." Someone asks for advice on running a mystery story arc, "You wouldn't have these problems if you ran a sand box." Someone has problems with their players not enjoying or playing in a sandbox, "Your players are are broken sheeple who you need to reeducate so then can appreciate the glorious sandbox that you are running." The OP's players may be meat popsicles. He's tired everything with the possible exception of sitting down and talking with them about it. I say possible, because he didn't comment on that (or I missed it). They also may be bored and apathetic because they want more out of a GM then a keyed map, a monster manual, and a random encounter table. I don't know. If he hasn't talked with them about it, he's failing as a GM. Sandboxes, despite peoples claims, are among the hardest medium for a GM to work in. They require the most preparation, the most player buy in, etc. That difficulty does not equate to superiority though. No. While the GM can do that, and the player's only real defense is to walk away, they shouldn't. By it's very nature, the player side of the screen can only effect change or take action if the GM allows it. The GM [u]should[/u] allow it pretty much as a matter of course, but it still only happens because the GM allows it. As I said above, the hand the rules least rules best and the GM is best served by viewing himself as first among equals rather then absolute tyrant. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Why I don't GM by the nose
Top