Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Why I love 5E - the renewal of Theater of Mind
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Tony Vargas" data-source="post: 6590069" data-attributes="member: 996"><p>You only have to map out the 5' squares that matter. In a running battle, for instance, terrain can 'move,' much like scrolling on a video game - or, if there's a vehicle involved, it's the part that's mapped. It's still handy to track relative movement and positioning.</p><p></p><p>In general, though, using a grid is a convenience, it's easier than using a plain play surface and measuring everything, which is easier that tracking lots of relative positions in your head. TotM is also a matter of what's convenient - if you have no play surface, or if, in game, there is no defined area where things are happening, or relative positioning and the like just isn't important. </p><p></p><p>When a group does lean towards one or the other, they'll favor different sorts of encounters an tactics. Mostly-TotM campaign will tend towards small (few enemies) encounters in simple environments that lend themselves to only a couple of meaningful positions (next to the Big Bad, far away from the big Bad; holding the doorway, in the room, in the corridor; holding onto the dragon; flying after the dragon, on the parapet; etc...). A campaign that tends to use a play surface will tend to have larger battles with more enemies and more detailed terrain - but to limit itself to areas that fit on the surface one way or another.</p><p></p><p>None of that has much bearing on whether the game 'supports' one style or another, though. A game that gives out definite distances, ranges, areas, speeds, and positioning rules - whether it does it in scale inches, in-world feet, 5' squares or 2m hexes - works better with a play surface, and needs to be ballparked, ignored, or otherwise adapted to TotM. A game that uses more abstract concepts of areas/position/movement facilitates TotM, but can be adapted to a little more precision using a surface, you just have to add to it or improvise a bit on the details. </p><p>5e, like all editions of D&D, is the former sort of game. </p><p>Frankly, I think that's a good decision, because it's easier to ballpark and ignore detail when necessary, than to manufacture more detail and the rules to handle it on the fly.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Tony Vargas, post: 6590069, member: 996"] You only have to map out the 5' squares that matter. In a running battle, for instance, terrain can 'move,' much like scrolling on a video game - or, if there's a vehicle involved, it's the part that's mapped. It's still handy to track relative movement and positioning. In general, though, using a grid is a convenience, it's easier than using a plain play surface and measuring everything, which is easier that tracking lots of relative positions in your head. TotM is also a matter of what's convenient - if you have no play surface, or if, in game, there is no defined area where things are happening, or relative positioning and the like just isn't important. When a group does lean towards one or the other, they'll favor different sorts of encounters an tactics. Mostly-TotM campaign will tend towards small (few enemies) encounters in simple environments that lend themselves to only a couple of meaningful positions (next to the Big Bad, far away from the big Bad; holding the doorway, in the room, in the corridor; holding onto the dragon; flying after the dragon, on the parapet; etc...). A campaign that tends to use a play surface will tend to have larger battles with more enemies and more detailed terrain - but to limit itself to areas that fit on the surface one way or another. None of that has much bearing on whether the game 'supports' one style or another, though. A game that gives out definite distances, ranges, areas, speeds, and positioning rules - whether it does it in scale inches, in-world feet, 5' squares or 2m hexes - works better with a play surface, and needs to be ballparked, ignored, or otherwise adapted to TotM. A game that uses more abstract concepts of areas/position/movement facilitates TotM, but can be adapted to a little more precision using a surface, you just have to add to it or improvise a bit on the details. 5e, like all editions of D&D, is the former sort of game. Frankly, I think that's a good decision, because it's easier to ballpark and ignore detail when necessary, than to manufacture more detail and the rules to handle it on the fly. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Why I love 5E - the renewal of Theater of Mind
Top