Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Enchanted Trinkets Complete--a hardcover book containing over 500 magic items for your D&D games!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Why I love supers RPG'ing (and applying this to D&D)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="buzz" data-source="post: 2752669" data-attributes="member: 6777"><p>I realize more and more that supers tends to be my favorite genre to game in, sometimes tying with fantasy for the top spot, sometimes nudging it to second place. Why?</p><p></p><p><strong>You don't really need a balanced party</strong>. Supers games tend to work no matter what archetypes of which the team is composed; nobody needs to be "stuck playing the cleric". Sure, players tend towards teams with some diversity, but it's not <em>requried</em>. The all-brick or all-mentalist team isn't nearly the game-breaker that the all-thief or all-warrior team is. Well, at least when we're talking D&D fantasy, FTMP. Consequently, since no one type is necessary, carrying on with a session when players are absent is a lot easier. Those PCs simply "aren't featured in this issue," as it were.</p><p></p><p><strong>You don't need to prep hordes of enemies</strong>. Supers games tend to feature a main villain or group of villains, and perhaps various mook types (agents, robots, etc.). PCs will likely encounter these villains more than once, usually with stretches of perparation and investigation in-between. And since the goal is not usually to kill them outright, the villains can recur. As for mooks, you make up one set of stats, and they all use them. In fantasy (again, mostly D&D for me), the assumption is that there will be many and varied encounters; this is why we have so many monster books, and why most of my prep is spent detailing statblocks. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /></p><p></p><p><strong>World-building is easy</strong>. Start with reality, add supers... done! <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f600.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":D" title="Big grin :D" data-smilie="8"data-shortname=":D" /> The basics are taken care of; no mapping out continents and writing up the history of "your" elves. You take the world as-is and then focus on incorporating supers. I.e., not on creating what "is", but just what "is different".</p><p></p><p><strong>All genres are fair game</strong>. Supers is inherrently multi-genre (probably why most supers RPGs make for good generic RPGs, and vice-versa). Fight aliens in space one week, go to an alternate timeline the next, and then find yourself trapped in ancient Greece after that. Cleanse the palate by foiling the occasional bank robbery.</p><p></p><p><strong>Personal stories and character background are <em>de rigeur</em></strong>. A supers game would not be complete unless a PC's s.o. got captured occasionally, their secret identity was threatened, or friends/foes from their past showed up to complicate things. So many good roleplaying opportunities. In most D&D games I've played, these sorts of character issues are usually an afterthought at best; they don't affect raiding dungeons, so they never come up.</p><p></p><p><strong>Kewl powerz</strong>. I like kewl powerz.</p><p></p><p>Now, I realize that there are some gripes about typical D&D fantasy in here, gripes which likely don't reflect the way a lot of people play. I'm a huge D&D fan, so I'm not trying to slam it. However, I have seen that the basic <em>mindset</em> with which my groups approach D&D (and even my Fantasy HERO game, to a certain extent) doesn't lend itself to much of what I list above. I have to wonder if this is why the interest level in the campaigns we run tends towards a limited lifespan, whereas the <em>Champions</em> game I'm in has been going strong for three years or so.</p><p></p><p>Anyway, examination of my tastes has got me thinking about the next fantasy game I run (likely an Eberron D&D game). I was toying with the idea of statting up the Justice League of Sharn*, and it made me consider the larger idea of applying the tropes of a supers campaign to a group of adventurers based in Sharn. Give them a base, have them fight crime (or at least investigate weirdness), set some key "supervillains" as the Big Bads of the campaign arc, involve personal complications, and so forth.</p><p></p><p>Basically, a change in my perspective to shake things up a bit.</p><p></p><p><span style="font-size: 9px">*"Kal," the warforged fighter with the adamantine body; the mysterious "Demon Bat," an urban ranger/vigilante; the aasimar paladin Diana; the mysterious changeling psychic warrior J'onn; etc.</span></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="buzz, post: 2752669, member: 6777"] I realize more and more that supers tends to be my favorite genre to game in, sometimes tying with fantasy for the top spot, sometimes nudging it to second place. Why? [B]You don't really need a balanced party[/B]. Supers games tend to work no matter what archetypes of which the team is composed; nobody needs to be "stuck playing the cleric". Sure, players tend towards teams with some diversity, but it's not [I]requried[/I]. The all-brick or all-mentalist team isn't nearly the game-breaker that the all-thief or all-warrior team is. Well, at least when we're talking D&D fantasy, FTMP. Consequently, since no one type is necessary, carrying on with a session when players are absent is a lot easier. Those PCs simply "aren't featured in this issue," as it were. [B]You don't need to prep hordes of enemies[/B]. Supers games tend to feature a main villain or group of villains, and perhaps various mook types (agents, robots, etc.). PCs will likely encounter these villains more than once, usually with stretches of perparation and investigation in-between. And since the goal is not usually to kill them outright, the villains can recur. As for mooks, you make up one set of stats, and they all use them. In fantasy (again, mostly D&D for me), the assumption is that there will be many and varied encounters; this is why we have so many monster books, and why most of my prep is spent detailing statblocks. :) [B]World-building is easy[/B]. Start with reality, add supers... done! :D The basics are taken care of; no mapping out continents and writing up the history of "your" elves. You take the world as-is and then focus on incorporating supers. I.e., not on creating what "is", but just what "is different". [B]All genres are fair game[/B]. Supers is inherrently multi-genre (probably why most supers RPGs make for good generic RPGs, and vice-versa). Fight aliens in space one week, go to an alternate timeline the next, and then find yourself trapped in ancient Greece after that. Cleanse the palate by foiling the occasional bank robbery. [B]Personal stories and character background are [I]de rigeur[/I][/B]. A supers game would not be complete unless a PC's s.o. got captured occasionally, their secret identity was threatened, or friends/foes from their past showed up to complicate things. So many good roleplaying opportunities. In most D&D games I've played, these sorts of character issues are usually an afterthought at best; they don't affect raiding dungeons, so they never come up. [B]Kewl powerz[/B]. I like kewl powerz. Now, I realize that there are some gripes about typical D&D fantasy in here, gripes which likely don't reflect the way a lot of people play. I'm a huge D&D fan, so I'm not trying to slam it. However, I have seen that the basic [i]mindset[/i] with which my groups approach D&D (and even my Fantasy HERO game, to a certain extent) doesn't lend itself to much of what I list above. I have to wonder if this is why the interest level in the campaigns we run tends towards a limited lifespan, whereas the [i]Champions[/i] game I'm in has been going strong for three years or so. Anyway, examination of my tastes has got me thinking about the next fantasy game I run (likely an Eberron D&D game). I was toying with the idea of statting up the Justice League of Sharn*, and it made me consider the larger idea of applying the tropes of a supers campaign to a group of adventurers based in Sharn. Give them a base, have them fight crime (or at least investigate weirdness), set some key "supervillains" as the Big Bads of the campaign arc, involve personal complications, and so forth. Basically, a change in my perspective to shake things up a bit. [SIZE=1]*"Kal," the warforged fighter with the adamantine body; the mysterious "Demon Bat," an urban ranger/vigilante; the aasimar paladin Diana; the mysterious changeling psychic warrior J'onn; etc.[/SIZE] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Why I love supers RPG'ing (and applying this to D&D)
Top