Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Million Dollar TTRPG Crowdfunders
Most Anticipated Tabletop RPGs Of The Year
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
ShortQuests -- Pocket Sized Adventures! An all-new collection of digest-sized D&D adventures designed for 1-2 game sessions.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Why I think current ECL rules are dumb.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Halivar" data-source="post: 1106358" data-attributes="member: 9327"><p>Okay, rules for CR are like this:</p><p></p><p>For a party of four level X adventurers, it should take one-fourth of their resources to defeat a CR X creature.</p><p></p><p>One might say:</p><p></p><p>In any given contest between a level X adventurer and a level X NPC or CR X creature, there is a 50%-50% chance on the outcome.</p><p></p><p>I think that's a reasonable statement, assuming no outlandishly equipped PC's.</p><p></p><p>Now, here's the rub. I believe these gauges sort of equate CR and CL. X in one is as powerful as X in the other. Why then, must we LA the creature to be a suitable PC? Is a creature really four (or what-have-you) levels more potent as a PC than as a creature?</p><p></p><p>IINM, the ECL for a half-celestial is +4 (CR +2). So, according to the rules (unless I am mistaken, and I may be, quite certainly), a level 1 fighter with the half-celestial template should be an even match for another level 5 fighter. This is certainly not the case. The level 1 half-celestial is going to get drossed.</p><p></p><p>So please help me out. Please tell me how these rules work if I'm getting them wrong. As it is, I see no reason why ECL shouldn't be tied to CR + CL.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Halivar, post: 1106358, member: 9327"] Okay, rules for CR are like this: For a party of four level X adventurers, it should take one-fourth of their resources to defeat a CR X creature. One might say: In any given contest between a level X adventurer and a level X NPC or CR X creature, there is a 50%-50% chance on the outcome. I think that's a reasonable statement, assuming no outlandishly equipped PC's. Now, here's the rub. I believe these gauges sort of equate CR and CL. X in one is as powerful as X in the other. Why then, must we LA the creature to be a suitable PC? Is a creature really four (or what-have-you) levels more potent as a PC than as a creature? IINM, the ECL for a half-celestial is +4 (CR +2). So, according to the rules (unless I am mistaken, and I may be, quite certainly), a level 1 fighter with the half-celestial template should be an even match for another level 5 fighter. This is certainly not the case. The level 1 half-celestial is going to get drossed. So please help me out. Please tell me how these rules work if I'm getting them wrong. As it is, I see no reason why ECL shouldn't be tied to CR + CL. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Why I think current ECL rules are dumb.
Top