Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Why I Think Rolling For Hit Points is a Bad Thing
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="thewok" data-source="post: 5925103" data-attributes="member: 60907"><p>I'd think average would be the way to go.</p><p></p><p>I'm not sure how they're doing monster hit points right now, so this may be way off. I'm going to use 3rd edition as an example. Third edition monsters used the average of their hit dice to determine their hp in the monster manuals. Some examples:</p><p></p><p>Troglodyte 2d8+4 (13hp)</p><p>Ankheg 3d10+12 (28hp)</p><p>Great Wyrm black dragon 37d12+296 (536hp)</p><p></p><p>We've seen the math for hit point distribution. It approximates a bell curve as the number of levels goes up. Thus, player hit points will tend toward average over the course of a campaign. The makers of 3E assumed players had average hit points.</p><p></p><p>Were a DM to simply grant maximum hit points to his players, monsters would need to similarly be given maximum hit points as well in order to maintain their challenge to the group. So, in a game with maximum hit points, that Great Wyrm dragon should have 713 hit points.</p><p></p><p>Then, we run into one of the criticisms of 4E: monsters have too many hit points, making encounters run too long. It'll also throw off the expected healing, making healing spells and hit dice half as effective over time, on average.</p><p></p><p>Like I said, the monsters may be using a different method for hit point generation than the players (and it seems like they are, but it's impossible to know how it's done without those rules released to us). Still, for testing, it makes more sense to assume the average and base the balance around that. It is impossible to balance around the entire spectrum of possible hit point totals, making average hit points the most simple method.</p><p></p><p>That is why I'd like to see static hit points as the default, with rolled hit points, max hit points and whatever else presented as options.</p><p></p><p>I'd also like to see the current rules for natural healing (or something like them) remain as the default, with "gritty" and "4e" style health modules added in as options.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="thewok, post: 5925103, member: 60907"] I'd think average would be the way to go. I'm not sure how they're doing monster hit points right now, so this may be way off. I'm going to use 3rd edition as an example. Third edition monsters used the average of their hit dice to determine their hp in the monster manuals. Some examples: Troglodyte 2d8+4 (13hp) Ankheg 3d10+12 (28hp) Great Wyrm black dragon 37d12+296 (536hp) We've seen the math for hit point distribution. It approximates a bell curve as the number of levels goes up. Thus, player hit points will tend toward average over the course of a campaign. The makers of 3E assumed players had average hit points. Were a DM to simply grant maximum hit points to his players, monsters would need to similarly be given maximum hit points as well in order to maintain their challenge to the group. So, in a game with maximum hit points, that Great Wyrm dragon should have 713 hit points. Then, we run into one of the criticisms of 4E: monsters have too many hit points, making encounters run too long. It'll also throw off the expected healing, making healing spells and hit dice half as effective over time, on average. Like I said, the monsters may be using a different method for hit point generation than the players (and it seems like they are, but it's impossible to know how it's done without those rules released to us). Still, for testing, it makes more sense to assume the average and base the balance around that. It is impossible to balance around the entire spectrum of possible hit point totals, making average hit points the most simple method. That is why I'd like to see static hit points as the default, with rolled hit points, max hit points and whatever else presented as options. I'd also like to see the current rules for natural healing (or something like them) remain as the default, with "gritty" and "4e" style health modules added in as options. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Why I Think Rolling For Hit Points is a Bad Thing
Top