Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Why I think we don't need rules for exploration, just tools.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="the Jester" data-source="post: 6242830" data-attributes="member: 1210"><p>I disagree with this very, very strongly. </p><p></p><p>What if the shy player likes the idea of playing a bard? You're basically saying that she shouldn't be able to. In essence, you're telling this player, "Sorry, no fun for you". By your argument, a shy player in a 1e game simply doesn't get to play paladins or druids, either. So what happens to this guy in a game where you roll stats in order, and he gets a high Charisma? Does he have special dispensation to rearrange stats from the DM, or is he stuck with a worthless high roll?</p><p></p><p>I recognize your argument, and it works fine for some groups. In fact, the discussion initially arose way back in the day, before there was a real skill system in D&D. But it certainly doesn't work for every group, and in fact, <em>that is the very reason that D&D grew social skills in the first place</em> - to decouple (to whatever extent) player skill with character skill. Not every group likes this decoupling, and that's fine, but surely you recognize that your stance comes with problems, both for the shy player and for the guys who really invests in diplomatic abilities. The more rp scenes are based strictly on roleplaying and not on the dice, the less any effort you put into making your character good at it matters. </p><p></p><p>As an example, I played a character who I wanted to be the world's best liar. The dm houseruled skill points (this was 3.x) so that there was no max, you could put them all into one skill if you wanted.</p><p></p><p>So I was playing this guy with over <strong>+100</strong> to Bluff checks. No matter how creative, quick-thinking and disingenuous I am, I personally will NEVER have that good of a liar's face. But my pc sure did!</p><p></p><p>And yet, somehow, I never convinced anyone of anything that I, personally, the player, couldn't convince someone of with my vastly inferior lying skills. </p><p></p><p>I found that tremendously dissatisfying, and I say this as a fairly charismatic, talkative, persuasive guy.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="the Jester, post: 6242830, member: 1210"] I disagree with this very, very strongly. What if the shy player likes the idea of playing a bard? You're basically saying that she shouldn't be able to. In essence, you're telling this player, "Sorry, no fun for you". By your argument, a shy player in a 1e game simply doesn't get to play paladins or druids, either. So what happens to this guy in a game where you roll stats in order, and he gets a high Charisma? Does he have special dispensation to rearrange stats from the DM, or is he stuck with a worthless high roll? I recognize your argument, and it works fine for some groups. In fact, the discussion initially arose way back in the day, before there was a real skill system in D&D. But it certainly doesn't work for every group, and in fact, [i]that is the very reason that D&D grew social skills in the first place[/i] - to decouple (to whatever extent) player skill with character skill. Not every group likes this decoupling, and that's fine, but surely you recognize that your stance comes with problems, both for the shy player and for the guys who really invests in diplomatic abilities. The more rp scenes are based strictly on roleplaying and not on the dice, the less any effort you put into making your character good at it matters. As an example, I played a character who I wanted to be the world's best liar. The dm houseruled skill points (this was 3.x) so that there was no max, you could put them all into one skill if you wanted. So I was playing this guy with over [b]+100[/b] to Bluff checks. No matter how creative, quick-thinking and disingenuous I am, I personally will NEVER have that good of a liar's face. But my pc sure did! And yet, somehow, I never convinced anyone of anything that I, personally, the player, couldn't convince someone of with my vastly inferior lying skills. I found that tremendously dissatisfying, and I say this as a fairly charismatic, talkative, persuasive guy. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Why I think we don't need rules for exploration, just tools.
Top