Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Oryan77" data-source="post: 4926120" data-attributes="member: 18701">I agree with everything that every single person has said about every single problem and every single good quality with every single edition.I played 2e cause I didn't know any better, but it was awesome until I realized I didn't know any of the rules. So I switched to 3e cause the rules were so much better than 2e rules, but then the Harm spell sucked so I switched to 3.5. 3.5 rocked cause they fixed a bunch of stuff that was broken in 3.0, but then 3.5 Fighters sucked, high levels sucked, and the rules bogged me down. So I switched to 4e. 4e was the bomb cause it was easy to learn &amp; I was a badass at level 1...but the sameness sucked, and pigeonholed roles sucked, so I switched to Pathfinder. Pathfinder was nice, but I'm not really sure why, and then it sucked because it's not made by WotC, so then I tried OD&amp;D. OD&amp;D was nice cause I can be more free with the rules, but OD&amp;D sucked cause people said I'm too oldschool and that sucks. So I switched back to 2e.2e was awesome again cause that's what I started with and it brought back a lot of memories. But then I realized that I still didn't know any of the rules. So I switched to 3.0.3.0 was cool again cause I remembered how much easier the rules were, but then I realized the Harm spell was still way too broken. So I switched to 3.5 again.3.5 rocked again cause.....<img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f615.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":confused:" title="Confused&nbsp; &nbsp; :confused:"&nbsp; data-smilie="5"data-shortname=":confused:" /><img src="http://www.enworld.org/forum/images/smilies/worried.png"&nbsp; class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":-S" title="Uhm&nbsp; &nbsp; :-S" data-shortname=":-S" /><img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f615.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":confused:" title="Confused&nbsp; &nbsp; :confused:"&nbsp; data-smilie="5"data-shortname=":confused:" /></blockquote>

[QUOTE="Oryan77, post: 4926120, member: 18701"] I agree with everything that every single person has said about every single problem and every single good quality with every single edition. I played 2e cause I didn't know any better, but it was awesome until I realized I didn't know any of the rules. So I switched to 3e cause the rules were so much better than 2e rules, but then the Harm spell sucked so I switched to 3.5. 3.5 rocked cause they fixed a bunch of stuff that was broken in 3.0, but then 3.5 Fighters sucked, high levels sucked, and the rules bogged me down. So I switched to 4e. 4e was the bomb cause it was easy to learn & I was a badass at level 1...but the sameness sucked, and pigeonholed roles sucked, so I switched to Pathfinder. Pathfinder was nice, but I'm not really sure why, and then it sucked because it's not made by WotC, so then I tried OD&D. OD&D was nice cause I can be more free with the rules, but OD&D sucked cause people said I'm too oldschool and that sucks. So I switched back to 2e. 2e was awesome again cause that's what I started with and it brought back a lot of memories. But then I realized that I still didn't know any of the rules. So I switched to 3.0. 3.0 was cool again cause I remembered how much easier the rules were, but then I realized the Harm spell was still way too broken. So I switched to 3.5 again. 3.5 rocked again cause..... :confused::-S:confused: [/QUOTE]

Verification