Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Why is it a bad thing to optimise?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Man in the Funny Hat" data-source="post: 5647912" data-attributes="member: 32740"><p>There's a difference between mere competence and excelling at specific, key tasks. I don't think most people have an issue with competence. It's when characters are developed to skew well beyond mere competence that hackles are raised.</p><p> </p><p>Whose baseline? The DM? The individual player? The rest of the players at the table? Why should players at the table be required to to "play up" to the level of time and effort to create a character when they don't NEED to or want to? This sort of argument does work both ways and comes down largely to differing preferences in style of play.</p><p> </p><p>I'd say that even in the simplest versions of D&D a certain amount of optimization is normal because it IS a game, and not JUST a roleplaying exercise.</p><p> </p><p>The DM is the one who has to arrange all the challenges for any given group of characters. The closer the characters are to "average" competence or even INcompetence the easier his job is. The higher the degree of optimization the more difficult his job is so it's natural for a DM to fight against that to one degree or another. It also naturally focuses not just the DM's attention but the point of the game upon mechanics. For a DM and/or other players who do NOT wish to obsess about mechanics and for whom a completely unoptimized character can get them what THEY want from the game it can <em>feel</em> like an impostion even if it isn't.</p><p> </p><p>The Stormwind Fallacy is that NEITHER focus (roleplaying versus optimization) is necessarily exclusive of the other. Don't fall into the trap of assuming that because someone illogically believes that your highly optimized character is a bad thing that their LESS optimized character is in turn a bad thing. Granted they may not mix well in the same party where players clearly have different focuses upon what THEY want from the game, but no matter how much better you think the party/game will work if everybody put more effort into optimizing their characters that is still a choice they are ALLOWED for their character unless the DM has set some other prerequisites for participation.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Man in the Funny Hat, post: 5647912, member: 32740"] There's a difference between mere competence and excelling at specific, key tasks. I don't think most people have an issue with competence. It's when characters are developed to skew well beyond mere competence that hackles are raised. Whose baseline? The DM? The individual player? The rest of the players at the table? Why should players at the table be required to to "play up" to the level of time and effort to create a character when they don't NEED to or want to? This sort of argument does work both ways and comes down largely to differing preferences in style of play. I'd say that even in the simplest versions of D&D a certain amount of optimization is normal because it IS a game, and not JUST a roleplaying exercise. The DM is the one who has to arrange all the challenges for any given group of characters. The closer the characters are to "average" competence or even INcompetence the easier his job is. The higher the degree of optimization the more difficult his job is so it's natural for a DM to fight against that to one degree or another. It also naturally focuses not just the DM's attention but the point of the game upon mechanics. For a DM and/or other players who do NOT wish to obsess about mechanics and for whom a completely unoptimized character can get them what THEY want from the game it can [I]feel[/I] like an impostion even if it isn't. The Stormwind Fallacy is that NEITHER focus (roleplaying versus optimization) is necessarily exclusive of the other. Don't fall into the trap of assuming that because someone illogically believes that your highly optimized character is a bad thing that their LESS optimized character is in turn a bad thing. Granted they may not mix well in the same party where players clearly have different focuses upon what THEY want from the game, but no matter how much better you think the party/game will work if everybody put more effort into optimizing their characters that is still a choice they are ALLOWED for their character unless the DM has set some other prerequisites for participation. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Why is it a bad thing to optimise?
Top