Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Why is it so important?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Kerrick" data-source="post: 3752216" data-attributes="member: 4722"><p>And it's a flawed assumption. I don't know where they're getting this idea. Firstly, a CR 5 monster is an EL ~3 encounter. Secondly, I don't think a party would blow more than about 15-20% of their resources against an equal-EL encounter, unless things went really badly for them. </p><p></p><p>I have to chime in on the side of folks like Sun Knight - if you're blowing all your spells in one or two encounters, maybe you should rethink how you're playing your PC, because realistically, that PC wouldn't survive very long. Wizards are supposedly smart - high Int, right? Clerics are wise. A wizard would look at the battle and say, "Should I cast a spell now (this round)? Or should I do something else? Should I just lean on my staff and watch the fighter hack the monster to bits and offer sardonic advice?" </p><p></p><p>'But it's not FUN!" you cry. "The wizard's just standing around back there twiddling his thumbs while everyone else does the work!" Well DUH. He's a leader. He's a tactician. He's a controller. Call it what you will, he's <em>supposed</em> to stand at the rear of the party (or in the middle). Our group had a skill called Knowledge (tactics) - you make a check, and you could offer advice to the other PCs that would gain them benefits - kind of like the teamwork feats from PHBII, but we've been using them for years. That's what someone with easily the highest Int in the party would (should) have. Personally, I wouldn't have a problem with giving them AP Light and a single martial WP of choice - the sword-wielding melee mage is very common in literature. They'd still have low hp and BAB, so they're no threat to the fighter, but they can defend themselves and others.</p><p></p><p>Clerics and druids have the hit points and skills (armor and weapons) to mix it up with the enemies - they can serve as first- or second-line combatants. Bards? They're support. They aid their comrades by singing, and they have roguish abilities - they can use their bows as archery support, or sneak around and flank enemies for the fighters, <em>while singing</em>. Sorcerers? They're strictly artillery. Given the fact they have a larger number of spells than the wizard, it's unlikely they'd run out before the party needs to rest.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Kerrick, post: 3752216, member: 4722"] And it's a flawed assumption. I don't know where they're getting this idea. Firstly, a CR 5 monster is an EL ~3 encounter. Secondly, I don't think a party would blow more than about 15-20% of their resources against an equal-EL encounter, unless things went really badly for them. I have to chime in on the side of folks like Sun Knight - if you're blowing all your spells in one or two encounters, maybe you should rethink how you're playing your PC, because realistically, that PC wouldn't survive very long. Wizards are supposedly smart - high Int, right? Clerics are wise. A wizard would look at the battle and say, "Should I cast a spell now (this round)? Or should I do something else? Should I just lean on my staff and watch the fighter hack the monster to bits and offer sardonic advice?" 'But it's not FUN!" you cry. "The wizard's just standing around back there twiddling his thumbs while everyone else does the work!" Well DUH. He's a leader. He's a tactician. He's a controller. Call it what you will, he's [i]supposed[/i] to stand at the rear of the party (or in the middle). Our group had a skill called Knowledge (tactics) - you make a check, and you could offer advice to the other PCs that would gain them benefits - kind of like the teamwork feats from PHBII, but we've been using them for years. That's what someone with easily the highest Int in the party would (should) have. Personally, I wouldn't have a problem with giving them AP Light and a single martial WP of choice - the sword-wielding melee mage is very common in literature. They'd still have low hp and BAB, so they're no threat to the fighter, but they can defend themselves and others. Clerics and druids have the hit points and skills (armor and weapons) to mix it up with the enemies - they can serve as first- or second-line combatants. Bards? They're support. They aid their comrades by singing, and they have roguish abilities - they can use their bows as archery support, or sneak around and flank enemies for the fighters, [i]while singing[/i]. Sorcerers? They're strictly artillery. Given the fact they have a larger number of spells than the wizard, it's unlikely they'd run out before the party needs to rest. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Why is it so important?
Top