Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Raven Crowking" data-source="post: 3753930" data-attributes="member: 18280">If Aus-Snow had said &quot;The majority have always supported Vancian magic&quot; then asking for evidence of the existence of said majority would be worthwhile.&nbsp; However, he said that, prior to the announcement of 4e, there had been no massive call for the end of Vancian magic.This is exactly the same as my saying &quot;unicorns don't exist&quot;.If you can demonstrate that such a call had existed, then you can prove him wrong.&nbsp; Just as, if you could show me a unicorn, you could prove me wrong.However, asking me to post evidence for the non-existence of unicorns......... <img src="http://www.enworld.org/forum/images/smilies/paranoid.png"&nbsp; class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":uhoh:" title="Paranoid&nbsp; &nbsp; :uhoh:" data-shortname=":uhoh:" /> RC(EDIT:&nbsp; Of course, if you believed that unicorns don't exist, and I was trying to change your belief, rather than merely stating mine, you would be right to ask for evidence.)</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Raven Crowking, post: 3753930, member: 18280"] If Aus-Snow had said "The majority have always supported Vancian magic" then asking for evidence of the existence of said majority would be worthwhile. However, he said that, prior to the announcement of 4e, there had been no massive call for the end of Vancian magic. This is exactly the same as my saying "unicorns don't exist". If you can demonstrate that such a call had existed, then you can prove him wrong. Just as, if you could show me a unicorn, you could prove me wrong. However, asking me to post evidence for the non-existence of unicorns......... :uhoh: RC (EDIT: Of course, if you believed that unicorns don't exist, and I was trying to change your belief, rather than merely stating mine, you would be right to ask for evidence.) [/QUOTE]

Verification