Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Why is it so important?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Mustrum_Ridcully" data-source="post: 3756963" data-attributes="member: 710"><p>That's a good point. Many D&D combats seem to focus on killing the monster/NPC or die trying. </p><p></p><p>So far, the distinction has mostly been between time-critical and time-neutral encounters. </p><p></p><p>But there are more types of encounters or adventures: </p><p>Think of a hostage situation. It will take some time until the kidnappers will actually do something bad to the hostage. So, the clock is ticking, but on the "per encounter scale".</p><p>But once you are in the encounter where you meet the kidnappers with the victim, now the time is on the combat scale - It is really bad in such a scenario if this encounter is your typical big-boss" monster encounter, because this will mean that some of the villains will survive long enough to have a reasonable chance of killing the hostage. </p><p>For have it work, the hostage guards must be "mooks" - it is now not a question if the characters will kill them at all, but it is a question if they can do it in time before any kidnapper gets to slit the throat of the poor hostage. </p><p></p><p>This scenario is exciting and difficult without ever entering a long-term resource management, nor requiring a life or death scenario for the characters.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Addendum:</p><p>In D&D 3, the lower level / mook encounters serve as attrition. But does that mean that the individual encounter becomes more exciting because you lost some hit points and spells? Or does it just mean that the last encounter becomes more interesting, because you might or might not have enough or the right ones left then? </p><p></p><p>If that is the case, is the fourth encounter worth the first "lame" three ones? </p><p>Or wouldn't it be more fun if I had just some "fool around encounters" where players get to figure out their new cool abilities (warming up a bit), and then run into the meaty encounters that are all thrilling because you have to use your wits and all the (encounter-renewable) resources available to you?</p><p></p><p>How important is it that the resources that I have at my disposal during any specific encounter is based on my daily resource management (as opposed to the choices I made on character advancement, maybe).</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Mustrum_Ridcully, post: 3756963, member: 710"] That's a good point. Many D&D combats seem to focus on killing the monster/NPC or die trying. So far, the distinction has mostly been between time-critical and time-neutral encounters. But there are more types of encounters or adventures: Think of a hostage situation. It will take some time until the kidnappers will actually do something bad to the hostage. So, the clock is ticking, but on the "per encounter scale". But once you are in the encounter where you meet the kidnappers with the victim, now the time is on the combat scale - It is really bad in such a scenario if this encounter is your typical big-boss" monster encounter, because this will mean that some of the villains will survive long enough to have a reasonable chance of killing the hostage. For have it work, the hostage guards must be "mooks" - it is now not a question if the characters will kill them at all, but it is a question if they can do it in time before any kidnapper gets to slit the throat of the poor hostage. This scenario is exciting and difficult without ever entering a long-term resource management, nor requiring a life or death scenario for the characters. Addendum: In D&D 3, the lower level / mook encounters serve as attrition. But does that mean that the individual encounter becomes more exciting because you lost some hit points and spells? Or does it just mean that the last encounter becomes more interesting, because you might or might not have enough or the right ones left then? If that is the case, is the fourth encounter worth the first "lame" three ones? Or wouldn't it be more fun if I had just some "fool around encounters" where players get to figure out their new cool abilities (warming up a bit), and then run into the meaty encounters that are all thrilling because you have to use your wits and all the (encounter-renewable) resources available to you? How important is it that the resources that I have at my disposal during any specific encounter is based on my daily resource management (as opposed to the choices I made on character advancement, maybe). [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Why is it so important?
Top