Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Why is it so important?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Imaro" data-source="post: 3771335" data-attributes="member: 48965"><p>Nice bit of non-logic there, especially where you don't put what I said in the context of the(original post) player deciding what percentage of resources he starts a per-day encouter. If I choose not to cast any spells in the first encounter I enter the next at 100%...if I cast two 0 level spells let's sat I'm at 70% for the next encounter(this is an arbitrary number as I have not done the math work to acurately represent the exact percentage that each of a wizards spells represent, but it serves the purpose of making my point nonetheless.</p><p></p><p>Let me first note, the purpose of the original post was an argument for why the per-encounter abilities would have to keep characters at a basically similar level of power. However, since Patryn has decided to take it totally out of context(and stiill totally screw up what it means even in that context) let me explain further...</p><p></p><p>Taking the previous post, in a per encounter model I am effectively at 30%(not 100%) all the time unless I use my per-day ability(at which point I am 100% for exactly one encounter then back to 30% for the rest of the day). So it is again less granularity through my own decisions. There is one major decision to make...when/what encounter will I be 100% in. In a per-day model I can choose to be a wider(both higher than30% or lower than 30%) range of effectiveness starting and throughout. IMHO, this allows for a wider range of "challenging" encounters, where in the above example(per-encounter) I will structure encounters for 30% and 100%.</p><p></p><p>Now I admit that the range of per-day abilities will impact this model greatly, but since we have heard the use of your per-day abilities(for the wizard) will leave one at 80% then we can infer that per-day will be about 20% of a characters overall effectiveness. Thus, the only resource impact one can have is a difference of 20%(through making a character use their per-day abilities). The per-encounter which make up 80% will never be lower than 80% at the beginning of any encounter, thus limiting the types of opponents(without DM fabricated factors) that one can challenge PC's(on a tactical and mechanical) level in the game to those monsters/NPC's that are a challenge for them at 70-100%. Almost anything else will be a cakewalk(20% to 90% difference).</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Imaro, post: 3771335, member: 48965"] Nice bit of non-logic there, especially where you don't put what I said in the context of the(original post) player deciding what percentage of resources he starts a per-day encouter. If I choose not to cast any spells in the first encounter I enter the next at 100%...if I cast two 0 level spells let's sat I'm at 70% for the next encounter(this is an arbitrary number as I have not done the math work to acurately represent the exact percentage that each of a wizards spells represent, but it serves the purpose of making my point nonetheless. Let me first note, the purpose of the original post was an argument for why the per-encounter abilities would have to keep characters at a basically similar level of power. However, since Patryn has decided to take it totally out of context(and stiill totally screw up what it means even in that context) let me explain further... Taking the previous post, in a per encounter model I am effectively at 30%(not 100%) all the time unless I use my per-day ability(at which point I am 100% for exactly one encounter then back to 30% for the rest of the day). So it is again less granularity through my own decisions. There is one major decision to make...when/what encounter will I be 100% in. In a per-day model I can choose to be a wider(both higher than30% or lower than 30%) range of effectiveness starting and throughout. IMHO, this allows for a wider range of "challenging" encounters, where in the above example(per-encounter) I will structure encounters for 30% and 100%. Now I admit that the range of per-day abilities will impact this model greatly, but since we have heard the use of your per-day abilities(for the wizard) will leave one at 80% then we can infer that per-day will be about 20% of a characters overall effectiveness. Thus, the only resource impact one can have is a difference of 20%(through making a character use their per-day abilities). The per-encounter which make up 80% will never be lower than 80% at the beginning of any encounter, thus limiting the types of opponents(without DM fabricated factors) that one can challenge PC's(on a tactical and mechanical) level in the game to those monsters/NPC's that are a challenge for them at 70-100%. Almost anything else will be a cakewalk(20% to 90% difference). [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Why is it so important?
Top