Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Why is it wrong to make alignment matter?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Knight Otu" data-source="post: 2665815" data-attributes="member: 192"><p>I concede that a cleric who follows a philosophy instead of a god can be just as good as a healer as a cleric of Pelor. But just using the core, there is no way a cleric of Hextor can get the Healing domain, which immediately makes him not the best healer.</p><p></p><p></p><p>The design philosophy you're referring to seems to be the one that says "Don't give mechanical advantages for roleplaying drawbacks" - which essentially boils down to - "since the characters are always in trouble anyway, giving them the drawback to be always in trouble is meaningless."</p><p>Mechanical adjustments for RP effects - well, those are more or less in play. The choice of deity determines which domains are available. The choice of alignment can impact on domains, spells, prestige classes, normal classes, the effects of various abilities on the character, etc.</p><p></p><p></p><p>The odd thing is, some of your comments made me think that this is what you want. No difference between the alignments, no difference between gods, I was almost tempted to think you want choices to be consequence-free. I was sure it wasn't the case, though, and now I can see it isn't, and I apologize for even thinking that.</p><p></p><p></p><p>I'd just like to formulate my current opinion on the matter, as I think some of it might have been lost in translation.</p><p></p><p>Allegiances can be tough. Pelor/Nerull, Good/Evil, Thor/Loki, Day/Night, DMs use them in sometimes subtly different ways. But we do get some information on what they are meant to be in the PHB (or whatever setting book is being used). We can find out easily that battling the undead/raising the undead, helping others/hurting others, thunder and lightning/trickery and deceit, the reveiling light/the conceiling dark are part of what defines that allegiance.</p><p></p><p>Mechanics on the other way, are relatively straightforward. Heal spells/inflict spells, improved aid another/improved damage, electricity damage/illusions, bonus to Sense Motive/bonus to Hide, every DM uses them in roughly the same way. Every character (or at least those with proper training) can make use of those. But we can also see some connection to those allegiances.</p><p></p><p>It isn't much of a stretch, then, in my opinion, to say "Those allegiances are obviously different. Why not give the option for characters to obtain powers related to those allegiances, so that the characters can be more integrated, and give more flavor to the world." No matter how flawed Magic of Incarnum is or is not, I personally do not consider the basic idea of "Allegiance Matters" to be flawed.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Knight Otu, post: 2665815, member: 192"] I concede that a cleric who follows a philosophy instead of a god can be just as good as a healer as a cleric of Pelor. But just using the core, there is no way a cleric of Hextor can get the Healing domain, which immediately makes him not the best healer. The design philosophy you're referring to seems to be the one that says "Don't give mechanical advantages for roleplaying drawbacks" - which essentially boils down to - "since the characters are always in trouble anyway, giving them the drawback to be always in trouble is meaningless." Mechanical adjustments for RP effects - well, those are more or less in play. The choice of deity determines which domains are available. The choice of alignment can impact on domains, spells, prestige classes, normal classes, the effects of various abilities on the character, etc. The odd thing is, some of your comments made me think that this is what you want. No difference between the alignments, no difference between gods, I was almost tempted to think you want choices to be consequence-free. I was sure it wasn't the case, though, and now I can see it isn't, and I apologize for even thinking that. I'd just like to formulate my current opinion on the matter, as I think some of it might have been lost in translation. Allegiances can be tough. Pelor/Nerull, Good/Evil, Thor/Loki, Day/Night, DMs use them in sometimes subtly different ways. But we do get some information on what they are meant to be in the PHB (or whatever setting book is being used). We can find out easily that battling the undead/raising the undead, helping others/hurting others, thunder and lightning/trickery and deceit, the reveiling light/the conceiling dark are part of what defines that allegiance. Mechanics on the other way, are relatively straightforward. Heal spells/inflict spells, improved aid another/improved damage, electricity damage/illusions, bonus to Sense Motive/bonus to Hide, every DM uses them in roughly the same way. Every character (or at least those with proper training) can make use of those. But we can also see some connection to those allegiances. It isn't much of a stretch, then, in my opinion, to say "Those allegiances are obviously different. Why not give the option for characters to obtain powers related to those allegiances, so that the characters can be more integrated, and give more flavor to the world." No matter how flawed Magic of Incarnum is or is not, I personally do not consider the basic idea of "Allegiance Matters" to be flawed. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Why is it wrong to make alignment matter?
Top